Based on the video of them acting illegally. Did you really just ask that with a straight face?
It seems that that conspiracy works against Trump⌠not for him.
Really?
The events of January 6 were the best thing that could have happened to democratsâŚany and all concerns about the November elections that were in the process of being legitimately presented in the House and Senate were rendered mootâŚat the end of that day liberals found a whole new reason to accuse Trumpâs supporters of being vile violent white supremacistsâŚhell it gave the left a whole new reason to impeach a guy who wasnât even the president anymore.
Democrats were the beneficiaries of January 6. IMHO it couldnât have worked out any better for lefties.
FreeAndClear: zantax: FreeAndClear:I get that Congress can investigate anything they want but what you are seeking is an investigation to prove a negative. Yes you are may be ok if they fail to prove the negative but thatâs what it is.
Epps is the king of the lizards and i want Congress to at least prove to me that he is not.
No, I want them to determine if they were working with anyone, no matter who it was, up to and including people in government.
Based on what?
Based on the video of them acting illegally. Did you really just ask that with a straight face?
Their criming isnât what you want. You have made that abundantly clear. You want the investigation into whether they worked for the feds. Thatâs based not on what they were doing but based on conspiracy theories.
Now the truth is beginning to come outâŚthat this whole January 6th saga, was a set up by the political establishment and our corrupt intelligence agencies from the get/go.
Hook, Line and SinkerâŚ
PlayedâŚyet again.
Plus video of him tearing down perimeter fence.
Evidence.
Plus video of him tearing down perimeter fence.
Evidence.
Of him tearing down perimeter fence. Is it evidence of anything else?
zantax: FreeAndClear: zantax: FreeAndClear:I get that Congress can investigate anything they want but what you are seeking is an investigation to prove a negative. Yes you are may be ok if they fail to prove the negative but thatâs what it is.
Epps is the king of the lizards and i want Congress to at least prove to me that he is not.
No, I want them to determine if they were working with anyone, no matter who it was, up to and including people in government.
Based on what?
Based on the video of them acting illegally. Did you really just ask that with a straight face?
Their criming isnât what you want. You have made that abundantly clear. You want the investigation into whether they worked for the feds. Thatâs based not on what they were doing but based on conspiracy theories.
Doesnât matter what I want, they committed various crimes and acted as if they had preplanned the event. The real question is why donât you want them investigated? Donât worry, we all know why.
FreeAndClear: zantax: FreeAndClear: zantax: FreeAndClear:I get that Congress can investigate anything they want but what you are seeking is an investigation to prove a negative. Yes you are may be ok if they fail to prove the negative but thatâs what it is.
Epps is the king of the lizards and i want Congress to at least prove to me that he is not.
No, I want them to determine if they were working with anyone, no matter who it was, up to and including people in government.
Based on what?
Based on the video of them acting illegally. Did you really just ask that with a straight face?
Their criming isnât what you want. You have made that abundantly clear. You want the investigation into whether they worked for the feds. Thatâs based not on what they were doing but based on conspiracy theories.
Doesnât matter what I want, they committed various crimes and acted as if they had preplanned the event. The real question is why donât you want them investigated?
There was some clear pre planning from numerous parties. None of it worked out imo as it turned into a riot but thatâs how it works i guess
Bullhorn guy did his part effectively.
The mob ran out of juice inside.
Wonder where the fence and signs disappeared to.
Bullhorn guy did his part effectively.
The mob ran out of juice inside.
Wonder where the fence and signs disappeared to.
Probably moved by the same guys who took selfies with the âtouristsâ
Do you think the FBI has infiltrated the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers? Yes, or no?
That is far more than trespassing where the barrier was removed.
This isnât a matter to disregard.
Yes
âŚ
Would you like chalkboard and string too?
That is far more than trespassing where the barrier was removed.
This isnât a matter to disregard.
The capital police should be completely reorganized. They ar responsible for at least one death. The swat guys who stood in front of the door moments before the shooting should be fired
The guys who took photos with the tourists should be fired as well
There is video of this.
The Epps stuff is chalkboard dots and strings kind of nonsense
Hook, Line and SinkerâŚ
PlayedâŚyet again.
I knooooooooooowâŚrite? Itâs amazing that outside of Hannity Land, I can actually make it in real life.
I donât think so.
Why didnât he listen to the Trump speech?
I am more interested in platform bullhorn guy and the fence remover.
There is smoke here.
I would encourage reading the entire article and the video evidence. I found it compelling in how the entrance was breeched and the swarm directed.
So many Trump supporters pleaded with these guys to not move fence and barrierâŚwith those goneâŚthe dupes strolled right in.
Read the Revolver report and get back to us on exactly who is being strung along.
Bring some meat to the table.
WuWei:Itâs not âproving a negativeâ.
An investigation is not proving a negative.
Hearings to disprove conspiracy theories is trying to prove a negative. Calling it an investigation is just an attempt to obfuscate the obvious. Yea again Congress has done this tons of times.
No, it is not. He was either working for them or he is not. They either had people inside or they did not.
If he wasnât working for them, prove he was working somewhere else. If he was, thereâs evidence of it.
I donât know where this chant of âcanât prove a negativeâ came from. Of course you can.
The compelling part is on purpose. They could have made compelling showing that he is a lizard. There is just no evidence other than someone saying he is a lizard and making accusations.
It not a chant of canât prove a negative. Itâs a chant of itâs silly to try to make people prove a negative. I.e he is a lizard until you prove to me that he is not.