The house select committee on Jan 6 Pt 2

[Camp]

Interesting comment in a thread that is about a mock panel attempting to do the very same thing.

[sikofit]

@Camp

Define “ meaningful .”

A back and forth discussion of facts and opinions.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

Interesting comment in a thread that is about a mock panel attempting to do the very same thing.

The adjectives are great.

[FreeAndClear]

@Camp

Define “meaningful.”

Keep flooding the memes. I feel like it’s an important contribution and speaks volumes.

[Camp]

I will and it is apropos.

[Camp]

[Samm]

@tnt

@Samm

The Congress takes longer bathroom breaks than what the rioters forced them to do.

Well, in that case, who cares that people forced their way into the capital to disrupt congress?

Now you’re getting it. Kinda late though, Pelosi and Company have already lit your hair on fire.

[Samm]

@tnt

@Samm

Which they did not accomplish. Why are you having such difficulty understanding this?

Trying to rob a bank is a crime.

And your point is? Nobody … not a single soul … has claimed that the intruders to the Capitol did not break the law.

[Samm]

@tnt

@Samm

Power was transferred right on schedule without a hitch.

Except for the ■■■■ on the carpets, the dead protestor, the stolen laptop, the VP having to refuse his SS detail who tried to drive him off premises, couple of cops having heart attacks and what not, lots of injuries and property damage.

Again … what’s your point? The conversation was about accomplishment. The protesters accomplished nothing. Power was transferred right on schedule.

[Samm]

@JayJay

@Jezcoe

@Samm

@Zodiac

Right. Permanently stop the transfer of power, worse than what they able to accomplish without guns. Seems like a legitimate thing to investigate and prevent from happening again.

Which they did not accomplish. Why are you having such difficulty understanding this?

The no harm no foul concept of trying to overturn the election.

Great stance.

It’s like if the bank robber fails to rob the bank- we should just let them go.

No it’s not. Not even remotely.

[WuWei]

[DougBH]

@tnt

@Samm

The Congress takes longer bathroom breaks than what the rioters forced them to do.

Well, in that case, who cares that people forced their way into the capital to disrupt congress?

For a few hours a year and a half ago? Only those who think they can squeeze one last drop of political benefit out of it.

[sikofit]

@DougBH

For a few hours a year and a half ago? Only those who think they can squeeze one last drop of political benefit out of it.

It’s not the protest that has Trump in legal hot water

[DougBH]

Is he?

[sikofit]

@DougBH

Is he?

Did you miss the multiple state and federal criminal probes?

“This Is Probably Bad for Former President Trump”: The DOJ Does Not Appear to...

[DougBH]

Same sort of story we’ve been hearing since 2016.

[sikofit]

@DougBH

Same sort of story we’ve been hearing since 2016.

Maybe because he is a lifelong conman

[tnt]

@Samm

@tnt

Well, in that case, who cares that people forced their way into the capital to disrupt congress?

Now you’re getting it. Kinda late though, Pelosi and Company have already lit your hair on fire.

If your kid broke into the toy store, ■■■■ on the rug, busted the place up, but somehow didn’t manage to steal any candy, would you punish them?

[tnt]

@Samm

And your point is? Nobody … not a single soul … has claimed that the intruders to the Capitol did not break the law.

You have repeatedly claimed it is no big deal. You just did it in your last post to me.

@Samm

@tnt

Well, in that case, who cares that people forced their way into the capital to disrupt congress?

Now you’re getting it. Kinda late though, Pelosi and Company have already lit your hair on fire.

[tnt]

@DougBH

For a few hours a year and a half ago? Only those who think they can squeeze one last drop of political benefit out of it.

The investigation would have been over a year ago if republicans cooperated.