There are a lot of people who should be in trouble about this. Especially the members of Congress who knew that fighting over fake electors was part of the plan and went along with it. Those who knew about fake electors, didn’t go along with it but said nothing should be forced to carry them failing their oath of office the rest of their lives.
sikofit: Jezcoe: Smyrna: sikofit:Translation: The NYT says things that I don’t like
How the New York Times publishes lies to serve a biased narrative
It is going to become harder to dismiss the emails as they become more part of a criminal probe.
Those emails are bad. I’m thinking Mark Meadows is already talking to his lawyers about flipping for immunity
There are a lot of people who should be in trouble about this. Especially the members of Congress who knew that fighting over fake electors was part of the plan and went along with it. Those who knew about fake electors, didn’t go along with it but said nothing should be forced to carry them failing their oath of office the rest of their lives.
Yeah the word “fake” goes to the heart of it. It shows intent to seize power maliciously. Very damning.
Then Luntz or somebody like him stepped an and urged them to say “alternate” instead of ‘fake’.
Were Democrats kicked off of the Benghazi committee hearings by Republicans in order to preserve the narrative?
We’re Democrats kicked off of the Benghazi committee hearings by Republicans in order to preserve the narrative?
Did Democrats put people on the committee that were participants to what they were investigating?
You in particular like to argue this isn’t being treated like a normal trial yet ignore that normal trials do not allow for such conflicts of interest
DougBH:We’re Democrats kicked off of the Benghazi committee hearings by Republicans in order to preserve the narrative?
Did Democrats put people on the committee that we’re participants to what they were investigating?
And let’s not forget that a lot of the testimony we’ve heard from the January 6 committee sessions has been from Republicans - many of them who were working for the key players.
Half empty…half full.
Dems have dirty hands in the 2020 election.
More so than Trump hyperbolic objections.
Settle in for the long haul.
Dems have dirty hands in the 2020 election.
More so than Trump hyperbolic objections.
Name 1 thing Democrats did that is worse than putting together multiple fake slates of electors (and outright callling the fake) in attempt to overturn an election they know they lost
Yeah…Nancy did her best to edit all of that out of the video she fed.
Is there a conspiracy you do not buy into, if it involves…democrats?
Smyrna:Yeah…Nancy did her best to edit all of that out of the video she fed.
Is there a conspiracy you do not buy into, if it involves…democrats?
That question is disingenuous. You know the answer
Drop boxes without required video monitors.
That was easy.
Drop boxes without required video monitors.
That was easy.
No that is not worse than trying to overturn an election you know you lost
Dems have dirty hands in the 2020 election.
How so?
More so than Trump hyperbolic objections.
They weren’t just objections. There were actions taken to attempt to overthrow the results.
Camp:Dems have dirty hands in the 2020 election.
How so?
They allowed mail in voting
Drop boxes without required video monitors.
That was easy.
Known as “Mail boxes”?
They weren’t just objections. There were actions taken to attempt to overthrow the results
He’s pretending that part doesn’t exist. It’s not real if you don’t acknowledge it
Camp:Drop boxes without required video monitors.
That was easy.
Known as “Mail boxes”?
D’oh…
…normal trials….
Thank you.
…normal trials….
Thank you
Yes you want this treated like a trial when it isn’t. But don’t worry those are coming