Stop.
This is literally the only thing you have said he did wrong. In the face of enormous evidence brought to you by his own aides and officials. The disconnect is…cultian.
Barr disagreed with What Trump was trying too. So much so that Trump wanted to replace him. Barr says Trump was wrong, but probably did nothing illegal.
I agree.
1 Like
He’s been loathesome for decades. Remember this one, from before he entered the GOP race:
It also allowed Trump to exercise his vast expertise of the law, and not totally look like a petty dumbass for threatening legal action against. . . the onion.
It makes miss Spy Magazine, which endlessly chronicled his ■■■■■■■■ back in the 80s:
Again- I’m not sure if you truly believe Trump did nothing wrong besides saying the election was stolen, or if you simply are defending for partisan purposes. But to say yeah thats all he did…defies credulity.
It follows from saying he shouldn’t have contested the vote that he shouldn’t have organized a huge protest to “stop the steal”. That doesn’t make organizing protests illegal.
Okay we are adding one more thing. Thats great. Any more?
No. That is not one more thing. That is part of saying he was wrong to contest the election without more proof. Once it was obvious there was not enough proof, he should have stopped all contesting.
Why? I’m not even the one who brought it up?
ETA: It’s off topic. Done.
Okay so would you then add to the things that Trump did that were wrong…
- pressuring elected officials to “find votes”
- creating alternate sets of electors
- pressuring Pence to not count the electors
etc etc.
Ooooh. It’s coming. A change in the breeze. A slight vibration in the ground. Perhaps a fire being prepared to burn a few uniforms and ID cards that could cause embarrassment down the line.
Especially because we simply have no idea who these people voted for or what they’ve supported. LOL.
2 Likes
It’s not that it’s off topic, it’s that it’s a lie.
2 Likes
Cone on Sneak, you know that in the mind of the “proggie leftists”, accused=is
The government contended that no fewer than four rental agents had stated that applications sent to the Trump offices for acceptance or rejection were coded by race. Doormen stated they were instructed to discourage African Americans seeking apartments by saying the superintendent was out. A super stated that he was instructed to send black applicants to the central office, while he was authorized to accept white applicants on the spot. Another rental agent said that Fred Trump had instructed him not to rent to African Americans. The Trumps had quoted different rental terms and conditions to African Americans and made false “no vacancy” statements to African Americans for Trump-managed apartments.
Sure.
But no worries: I will stop documenting his non-history of non-racism here because, for some reason, it’s really important not to call Donald Trump a racist, ever.
Why does he have that protected status, even with evidential support and examples? Seems weird. Do you have a special affection for him"?
He’s an old school bigot. What he said was not “racist” by definition. It was bigoted. I do not want to have to vote for Joe.
Maybe we’ll just call Trump an “old school bigot”? That cool?
Who can say?
2 Likes
These lies must be stopped.
1 Like
…1973. good job
proves nothing. same stupid trope used for past 8 years as desperate proof he’s racist.
I like how if we bring up more recent examples, they don’t count (or are forbidden?). But if we document the historical examples going back 50 years, that doesn’t count, either. Seems like a really reasonable, well-thought-out position.
This is off-topic, sure.
But during the testimony, the auto closed-captioning software had a real hard time with Pat Cipollone’s name - with some amazing results:
2 Likes
there are no more recent examples that are anything more than people’s angry bias
if you want to keep trying to proof he’s a racist why not try to find some examples of things he said that match what Biden has said
3 Likes
