The strategy is to make the right of the people to keep and bear arms such a diminished right that no one will even notice.
Some noticed:
To start, he argued, courts should not be cherry-picking constitutional rights to expand or diminish.
Thomas described the 9th Circuit’s approach as “indefensible,” and California’s scheme as part of a “distressing trend” of treating the Second Amendment “as a disfavored right.”
This is an example, just one of many, of the problem with this idiotic notion of The Living Constitution and The Final Arbiters.
The Constitution is the final arbiter of what is Constitutional.
It is amazing. Their sociopathic chosen one is setting the table for a Democrat to declare guns a “national emergency” yet they are so blinded by partisanship they refuse to see it.
You need to drop this romantic but totally divorced from reality notion that guns protect you from any of that government overreach, or will do in the near future.
