And if we crave diversity and aesthetics for their own sakes, we are more than capable of creating it. How do you think we got so many dog breeds?
Clearly the have some difference, which is the definition of diversity, no matter your artificial threshold.
Yes, like I said, the look different and have differing behavior, when that behavior is no longer suitable for that environment the pizzlie comes in because it is better adapted to the new climate. And do you notice something? This adaptation was rapid enough to match the rate of change. There was no period of no large bears in the biome. And dollars to donuts you will end up with more bears not less as it warms.
Have rates of change been comparable to todayās?
We have been changing at this rate for a while, and as we can see it provided ample time for evolution to fill the warmer niche without a period of no bears in it. And if it keeps warming, grizzlies will occupy it next.
There are thousands of coral species. You have way too much confidence in our genetic engineering and selective breeding when it comes to coral than I do.
I think we can, provided the luddites donāt stop it.
Not specific to coral but should be applicable as well.
We (humans) probably donāt have 5000 years to prepare for anything.
The ozone depletion issue was a simple chemical reaction. Global climate change, is orders of magnitude more complex and not nearly as well understood.
Look at this:
Francesco Muschitiello, an author on the study and assistant professor of geography at the University of Cambridge, said the findings were worrisome because the early warming suggests there might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change.
Fund us, we need to figure out why weāre wrong.
Muschitiello said itās not clear how much of a role, if any, human-caused climate change played in the early Arctic warming, and more research is needed.
Stick to the story!
āWeāre talking about the early 1900s, and by then weāve already been supercharging the atmosphere with carbon dioxide,ā he said.
Who was Francesco? Who was āsuperchargingā in 1900? How were they doing it.
This is pure propaganda. These guys are full of ā ā ā ā .
1 Like
Supercharged? Maybe 25 ppm above 1800 baseline.
You can always get insight as to a personās agenda by the adjectives and adverbs they use to describe things and actions.
1 Like
Itās still a hoax. It goes in cycles. Man has little to do with it. We just need to adapt. We always have.
2 Likes
So do extinction level meteor strikes.
Exactly. So why panic now?
Sure. Something is threatening civilization as we know it. Why panic?
Didnāt you just say that that kind of ā ā ā ā happens in cycles? Why panic about the inevitable when there is not a damned thing you can do about it?
1 Like
Well thatās just not true.
