The Curious Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia (Part 2)

cOuRt oF PuBliC oPiNiOn!

Trump’s lawyers in both proceedings were not allowed to present evidence in his defense. One lie they tried to disprove was Ms. Carroll described a “designer” dress she was wearing during the alleged assault, had not been available to the public for two years after the date of the incident. Judge deemed that fact inadmissible. According to court documents Carroll called two friends “within minutes” after the incident. Interesting, why not the police?
In the end, Carroll and her lawyers received summary judgment. Trump has been hosed by the NY courts numerous times so “sham” is a nice way to put it IMO.

3 Likes

the latest

“In the meantime, the attorneys said ICE is preparing to interview Abrego Garcia after he filed an official notice expressing fear of deportation to Liberia. His attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, told the judge they have received some confidential documents pertaining to assurances from the Liberian government about how Abrego Garcia would be treated there. However, they are not satisfied by what they have received. He hinted that the Liberian government has only agreed to take Abrego Garcia for a limited time.“

Liberia does not him either. lol.

Allan

1 Like

:index_pointing_up: :index_pointing_up: :index_pointing_up:

Nails it.

1 Like

yes yes yes. The Georgia court hosed him (never mind all the people who already pleaded guilty). The Florida court hosed him (never mind he had endless boxes of confidential information in his bathroom and refused to return it). The DC courts hosed him


The guy just can’t get a fair break I tell ya.

1 Like

Yet try as they might to bring him down, he is now sitting in the WH. Go figure.

2 Likes

Right? Just can’t get a fair shake amiright?

You might recall that getting back to the WH made the open cases go away.

Why the need to make up things that are not true? Are you so hate filled that you can’t stand the truth?

I didn’t make up anything. It’s exactly what was found in court. Liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Are you so deep in MAGA that you can’t read the actual outcome?

Here I thought you progs were all about innocent until proven guilty?
Guess that just applies to illegal criminals.
According to you conservatives are guilty. No need for a trial. How many of us do you want to declare guilty? All of us or just a few until we learn our place and shut up and allow you progs to do what every you want.

1 Like

You don’t get to change your story. You called it rape and that was not true. You seem to have trouble with the truth.

2 Likes

It wasn’t a criminal case.

The judge in the case made it clear that in common parlance it was rape. But hey, if you want to justify the President putting his fingers in a woman’s vagina against her will by saying it was sexual abuse, please - go ahead.

Care in Florida was not a criminal case? How about Georgia? Because those were two of the cases where you were declaring trump guilty without a trial. All because of your hate.

I was declaring him guilty without a trial? Show me where I did that.

Nope you made up the rape charge. And you did this after lying about trumps first wife and rape.

1 Like

Still not rape. You are still not making yourself look any better.

In your very post. I don’t expect you to be honest about it though.

By any common definition, as the judge said, it’s rape. In many states, it’s rape. But again, go ahead and scream from the hilltops that he just placed his fingers in her vagina against her will if that makes you feel better.

When are you going to admit you were wrong? Or are you just going to continue pushed things that are not true?