Continuing the discussion from The Curious Case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia (Part 1) - #10029 by peek-a-boo.
Previous discussions:
1 Like
Round 2… FIGHT!!
4 Likes
From @PurpnGold in part 1.
I 100% understand your hypotheticals. I just don’t understand why you think they are important or what you think they solve.
I’m just looking for discussion. I don’t mean to imply they are important or even relevant.
They knew what ES offered. They chose to accept it. They could have chosen not to accept it and find another country who wouldn’t incarcerate. But they didn’t.
My point was focused on possible motive, not necessarily results. With scenario 1, incarceration would have been mandatory. With scenario 2, it would have been optional.
Turns out ES wasn’t about to let them roam free. I really don’t think the administration cared one way or the other, whether they were incarcerated, as long as they were no longer in the US.
My guess is that at the end of the 1-year contract they will likely land back in their native Venezuela.
So your scenario 1 is exactly what happened. The US wanted a foreign country to send their criminals and prison is where you house criminals.
They could have been incarcerated in either scenario.
You do realize the part 1 thread has been closed and that no one can respond to your posts?
As to your above thoughts, all I can says is good look with any of it happening.
Bookmark.
John Stewart boom.
1 Like
I will continue to point out that you endorse actions that anywhere else would be the stuff of failing banana republics.
And no, I don’t mean metrosexual Gap stores.
2 Likes
Was this really necessary? The previous thread had not evolved in its last 7 or 8 thousand posts. 
3 Likes
From Part I Thread…
Worldwatcher:
He was abducted in Maryland which is where he and his wife live (well he lived until the US government mistake that resulted in his being in prison). That’s where SHE filed the original complaint.
WW
Peek-a-boo
But all immigration related activity took place in Texas. That’s where he was being detained before his mistaken deportation.
And he wasn’t abducted.
.
.
.
Yes he was abducted, the US Government even admits his capture wad a mistake.
Maryland is where he lived, Maryland is where he worked, Maryland is where his wife and children are.
Maryland is where he was abducted and so that is where the immigration related activity started and where his wife filed the initial complaint.
WW
1 Like
Tell peek to quit making stuff up. 
Okay. But if I do, will you quit repeating yourself?
1 Like
Touché. The chicken comes before the egg though.
That’s debatable.
1 Like
Yes. Don’t like it? Ignore it.
What are you asking me for? I didn’t make this thread. 
Knock yourself out. If you feel you need to make stuff up to feel better about yourself, then who am I to argue.
There is still more Garcia to come. But as to the rinse, repeat, rinse again. You are spot on. While we wait for the next Garcia shoe to drop, we are rehashing past history over and over again.
Show me where the Trump administration says they mistakenly took Garcia into custody.
He wasn’t abducted. He was lawfully taken into custody and sent to detention in Texas.
I can play that game too. Stop repeating the same LW talking points.
