Briefly up on Tates’ wikipedia page. Ha ha!
7 Likes
Edit - my bad
Now that was a good one!
Damn. Owned again. 
Hey. We’re just laughing at Andrew Tate and marveling at the sublime nature of Karma.
1 Like
Yes…
1 Like
Don’t be silly. Women are ‘splainin’ to men what’s wrong with them all the time. 
6 Likes
Tate did what we like to call in the multiplayer FPS community “playing yourself.”
1 Like
I’ve seen some of his stuff on YouTube. Some content isn’t too far out there, other content was a cess pool, and he always came off as a ■■■■■■.
Elon was doing some dog whistles to Tate’s “Matrix” stuff today, I see.
1 Like
Here in America, your skin color determines how racist your speech may be.
5 Likes
3 Likes
Not ignorant.
He has known what he is doing all along.
2 Likes
Only one side is being censored! When AOC was censored on twitter a month ago she was calling people Hitler.
1 Like
I am not a constitutional expert but is not freedom of speech all about being able to speak your mind without fear of reprisals from the government? Not private businesses?
Why should platforms have to give Tate a voice to talk about his misogynistic views or let him talk about how women have to take some responsibility when they are sexually assaulted?
It seems we are moving the goalposts of freedom of speech to now speech being free of all consequences.
Tate has no inherent right to use any platform to spout his vile messages.
2 Likes
They shouldn’t. Twitter is a tiny tiny portion of the internet. As long as they aren’t violating laws, they should be allowed to do what they want.
Twitter was billed as this “public square” but it really isn’t. Twitter has now started charging money for your message to get more visibility than others. Imagine going to a real public square and having to pay a monthly fee to use a bullhorn.
Conservatives are, definitely.
3 Likes
Yes it is.
Corporate consequences? Collective consequences? For ideology?
How is what Tate says about women more misogynistic than a rap?
If you don’t like the message, change the channel. No need to banish from the village.
It isn’t.
It’s a privately owned company. It’s a company that charges monthly for your speech to be more far reaching than other non paying users.
How many physical public squares do that?
