The bright side of Lib stupidity?

[Sknyluv]

@DougBH

The same thing as moving for tax purposes. Oh Lordy.

Different states have different laws. Adults and businesses make decisions on where to locate depending on those laws. Seems pretty similar to me.

[WuWei]

@JayJay

Yet more brutal naked honesty that shows this was never about the child after all.

Force the birth to happen but after that “Sorry you slut…the kid is your problem now…bootstraps, baby!”

I tell you I am LOVING this thread.

We have a law in Texas; anybody can drop a new born at the fire station - no questions asked.

[JayJay]

@zantax

@JayJay

@zantax

@BraveGear

My money, my choice.

Should also get a vote on termination, break the tie fairly, with a coin toss

You as the father want to take all the responsibility that would go with having that choice?

Lots more responsibility there than perhaps you think.

Hell if you’re going to force a woman to carry the child to term, then the father should be immediately held responsible for supporting the mother and child, and if she doesn’t know who the father is, every man that slept with her in the requisite time frame ought to be forced to take a paternity test to identify the father.

You down for all that?

I supported my children and their mother without state force.

Yippee for you, oh morally superior one.

Not everyone is as morally awesome as you.

Now answer the question, please?

[WuWei]

@JayJay

Yippee for you, oh morally superior one.

Not everyone is as morally awesome as you.

Why not?

[zantax]

@WuWei

@JayJay

Yet more brutal naked honesty that shows this was never about the child after all.

Force the birth to happen but after that “Sorry you slut…the kid is your problem now…bootstraps, baby!”

I tell you I am LOVING this thread.

We have a law in Texas; anybody can drop a new born at the fire station - no questions asked.

Most states do. And how is, abortion for the life of the mother valid after viability. How does killing it instead of preserving its life harm the mother? Unless she can’t withstand a c section.

[DougBH]

I’m pretty sure that’s how it already works. Ask Hunter.

[coolidge]

Same here in south carolina.

[zantax]

@JayJay

@zantax

@JayJay

@zantax

@BraveGear

My money, my choice.

Should also get a vote on termination, break the tie fairly, with a coin toss

You as the father want to take all the responsibility that would go with having that choice?

Lots more responsibility there than perhaps you think.

Hell if you’re going to force a woman to carry the child to term, then the father should be immediately held responsible for supporting the mother and child, and if she doesn’t know who the father is, every man that slept with her in the requisite time frame ought to be forced to take a paternity test to identify the father.

You down for all that?

I supported my children and their mother without state force.

Yippee for you, oh morally superior one.

Not everyone is as morally awesome as you.

Now answer the question, please?

I did answer it.

[Optrader]

@Jezcoe

@Optrader

Those “fewer services” you mention used to be called “parents.” It is not the job of the state to raise peoples children.

If a State is going to ban abortions… they need to get ready for more poor single mothers.

Having run a bus route in a project full of poor single mothers, I can assure you the availability of abortions has zero impact on their poor motherhood. Quite the contrary. Many were very candid about the fact that having MORE children got them MORE welfare.

Your argument fails also because while it has a negligible effect on curbing poverty stricken mothers, it does, on whole kill a much larger percentage of minority than white babies, which is precisely what Maggie Sanger was trying to accomplish.

I would think you lefties would be against things that are blatantly racist, but as usual your hypocrisy overrides your faux outrage.

[e7alr]

@JayJay

Yep like whether or not to get the vaccine.

Something the courts upheld your right to do…remember?

The court hasn’t taken away the opportunity to get an abortion. At least be honest about what the court did.

[Jezcoe]

@Optrader

@Jezcoe

@Optrader

Those “fewer services” you mention used to be called “parents.” It is not the job of the state to raise peoples children.

If a State is going to ban abortions… they need to get ready for more poor single mothers.

Having run a bus route in a project full of poor single mothers, I can assure you the availability of abortions has zero impact on their poor motherhood. Quite the contrary. Many were very candid about the fact that having MORE children got them MORE welfare.

Your argument fails also because while it has a negligible effect on curbing poverty stricken mothers, it does, on whole kill a much larger percentage of minority than white babies, which is precisely what Maggie Sanger was trying to accomplish.

I would think you lefties would be against things that are blatantly racist, but as usual your hypocrisy overrides your faux outrage.

Sanger died a very long time ago.

But having more children to get more welfare…. Wow… just wow.

[zantax]

@e7alr

@JayJay

Yep like whether or not to get the vaccine.

Something the courts upheld your right to do…remember?

The court hasn’t taken away the opportunity to get an abortion. At least be honest about what the court did.

It’s an epidemic on the left, rioting in states that are expanding abortion up to birth. This ruling is resulting in less restrictive abortion per capita rather than more.

[margaretms2]

I can’t assume but: Are there any other women participating in this thread?

[Paul_Thomson]

@margaretms2

In the same way that a dumb, expensive war and a Russian credit default only herald Putin’s triumph over the US and the EU, it also follows that discouraging large numbers of women from coming to your state is totally cool and normal. Hey hormonal college guys—enjoy the increased competition.

How many is “large numbers of women”? 100?1000? 10,000? Seems a large number of lib women may not understand the concept of interstate travel.

[zantax]

@Paul_Thomson

@margaretms2

In the same way that a dumb, expensive war and a Russian credit default only herald Putin’s triumph over the US and the EU, it also follows that discouraging large numbers of women from coming to your state is totally cool and normal. Hey hormonal college guys—enjoy the increased competition.

How many is “large numbers of women”? 100?1000? 10,000? Seems a large number of lib women may not understand the concept of interstate travel.

Hallmark of the left, paternal, nobody can be trusted to do the right thing. Daddy government decides.

[margaretms2]

@zantax

@Paul_Thomson

@margaretms2

In the same way that a dumb, expensive war and a Russian credit default only herald Putin’s triumph over the US and the EU, it also follows that discouraging large numbers of women from coming to your state is totally cool and normal. Hey hormonal college guys—enjoy the increased competition.

How many is “large numbers of women”? 100?1000? 10,000? Seems a large number of lib women may not understand the concept of interstate travel.

Hallmark of the left, paternal, nobody can be trusted to do the right thing. Daddy government decides.

No, you’re on the side of Daddy government decides, not me. Like, really on the nose with it here.

[zantax]

@margaretms2

@zantax

@Paul_Thomson

@margaretms2

In the same way that a dumb, expensive war and a Russian credit default only herald Putin’s triumph over the US and the EU, it also follows that discouraging large numbers of women from coming to your state is totally cool and normal. Hey hormonal college guys—enjoy the increased competition.

How many is “large numbers of women”? 100?1000? 10,000? Seems a large number of lib women may not understand the concept of interstate travel.

Hallmark of the left, paternal, nobody can be trusted to do the right thing. Daddy government decides.

No, you’re on the side of Daddy government decides, not me.

Lol, the court just relinquished autocratic power and returned it to democratic processes.

[margaretms2]

What does this mean? The OP referred to college choices. This has to do with where young women choose to live. Again, wouldn’t the sensible choice be: a state where you have more freedom?

For example, why would I want to limit my choices or risk any legal complications if dealing with a miscarriage (which are common) or an ectopic pregnancy? It makes no sense.

[DougBH]

Yes, it certainly doesn’t. Please list the states that bring charges against having miscarriages.

[Ben_Natuf]

@Jezcoe

It seems wise to not voluntarily go to a state where your private life decisions can be voted upon.

that would be all 50 of them