The big freaken MSM lie: they want to overturn the election

[Steel-W0LF]

@PurpnGold

@WildRose

Learn to follow the conversation. We’re discussing the Texas Lawsuit.

@WildRose

Hard to gin up the kind of outrage necessary to push the hard left agenda if you stick to the truth.

True or not nearly half the country has serious doubts as to the legitimacy of our last election and wants answers.

That isn’t trying to “overturn the results of an election” it’s wanting to ensure those results are accurate.

Which part of this post was about the lawsuit?

Umm. All of it.

And let’s flip it around.

Which part of his post gives a hoot about anything Trump said.

[WildRose]

Which part of that post even mentions Trump?

It doesn’t.

We had the same problem in 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004, and 2000. Nearly half the country has serious concerns about our election system every time we go through a presidential election.

Trump is only the current subject of discussion, he wasn’t around for the four prior elections.

[PurpnGold]

@Steel-W0LF

Umm. All of it.

And let’s flip it around.

Which part of his post gives a hoot about anything Trump said.

He tried to say none of this was about stealing the election from democrats who stole it from “us”

That’s not true

[WildRose]

Read the OP.

The big freaken MSM lie: they want to overturn the election

. For starters, I suggest those interested in the subject, should Google “want to overturn the 2020 election” and you will probably find approximately 55,700,000 results (0.38 seconds), which is what I found. But is the charge [they want to overturn an election] really accurate as claimed by our mainstream media? According to an article published last month, UPDATE: 21 States Now Support Texas SCOTUS Lawsuit, 42% of America to Sue 8% of America, the lawsuit merely asks the Supreme Court to hea…

[PurpnGold]

@johnwk2

But is the charge [they want to overturn an election] really accurate as claimed by our mainstream media?

Yes it is.

That’s my point. It’s not the media making this up. They are posting Trumps tweets… his videos, his words.

He called Georgia SOS to “find votes”
He told Pence to reject electors

[WildRose]

@PurpnGold

He called Georgia SOS to “find votes”

How about we look at that in full context?

He never asked the SoS to do anything remotely illegal or unethical.

[Smyrna]

The SCOTUS abandoned their responsibility when they declined to hear this case.

[johnwk2]

@WildRose

Hard to gin up the kind of outrage necessary to push the hard left agenda if you stick to the truth.

True or not nearly half the country has serious doubts as to the legitimacy of our last election and wants answers.

That isn’t trying to “overturn the results of an election” it’s wanting to ensure those results are accurate.

What is so troubling is, corruption-free elections are an essential part of a freedom loving people, and yet, an identifiable segment of our nation’s population condemn any attempt to ferret out the obvious corruption and fraud which took place during this last election. Aside from that our very own Supreme Court has worked to obstruct any meaningful review of specific charges of illegal election activity which took place in a number of states.

I sincerely suspect that had the Supreme Court done its job and heard the Texas case, reviewed the evidence and listened to the witnesses, and then provided, at the very least, specific guidelines to prevent the kind of massive illegal voting which took place, it would have helped to calm the nation and prevented the dangerous anger which has been built up across the nation.

JWK

When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to legislative acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in such treachery.

[PurpnGold]

@johnwk2

I sincerely suspect that had the Supreme Court done its job and heard the Texas case, reviewed the evidence and listened to the witnesses, and then provided, at the very least, specific guidelines to prevent the kind of massive illegal voting which took place, it would have helped to calm the nation and prevented the dangerous anger which has been built up across the nation.

This would not have stopped Trump supporters from believing.

Georgia, for example, did 3 hand counts. Still conservatives are saying they cheated.

The Supreme Court would not have changed anything, they are deep state now and would have been even if they had heard the case.

There is no evidence of massive fraud. At least nothing has been brought forward in any courts.

[WildRose]

The trouble is that if they had actually taken a case for review and decided it either way they’d be seen as acting politically just like in 2000 and there is a firm belief that, that decision sullied the courts reputation terribly.

I can’t remember his exact words but the CJ at the time stated after that decision he hoped they would never again be put in that position because the courts must be seen as non political.

Since then no court has been willing to take on completely political questions.

Consider too that if they had done so, no matter how they decided they would likely have seen an even bigger and angrier response at the SCOTUS building itself and they certainly are afraid of that.

[WildRose]

There is no such universal agreement among conservatives.

[tzu]

Silly man, that’s True America taking its nation back.

[TommyLucchese]

You’re doing a good ■■■■■■■ impression of it the.

[johnwk2]

@PurpnGold

@johnwk2

I sincerely suspect that had the Supreme Court done its job and heard the Texas case, reviewed the evidence and listened to the witnesses, and then provided, at the very least, specific guidelines to prevent the kind of massive illegal voting which took place, it would have helped to calm the nation and prevented the dangerous anger which has been built up across the nation.

This would not have stopped Trump supporters from believing.

Of course, that is your personal and politically charged OPINION. The Trump supporters I know simply wanted a court to give an evidentiary hearing, review evidence, listen to witness and fulfil the obligation for a redress of grievances.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, in addition to Facebook, Twitter ETC., and countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

[PurpnGold]

@johnwk2

Of course, that is your personal and politically charged OPINION. The Trump supporters I know simply wanted a court to give an evidentiary hearing, review evidence, listen to witness and fulfil the obligation for a redress of grievances.

Do you trust the Georgia hand count?

Yes or no would suffice

[Tom_Ch]

@WildRose

Hard to gin up the kind of outrage necessary to push the hard left agenda if you stick to the truth.

True or not nearly half the country has serious doubts as to the legitimacy of our last election and wants answers.

That isn’t trying to “overturn the results of an election” it’s wanting to ensure those results are accurate.

Is result is Georgia accurate?

[gooddad409]

@Smyrna

The SCOTUS abandoned their responsibility when they declined to hear this case.

They did and in a most cowardly fashion. If they had at least heard the case things would have settled down much more quickly.

[vaard]

Trump conceded the night of the election and did everything in his power to ensure their was an orderly transition…

Anything else is a liberal lie…

[Konssurvative1]

@johnwk2

MLK was spot on when he said . . . “A riot is the language of the unheard”.

Funny,
I bet you didn’t believe that last summer when this very same quote was used in describing why black people in America were doing what they were doing with all of the “unjustified shootings perpetrated by the police force”? I bet you felt that their cause was unjust in making riots the language of the unheard…but now because it’s unfair to you…and you feel unheard…all of a sudden this quote is “quotable”

Not buying it…not from you.

[Konssurvative1]

@johnwk2

You bet Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff have won. Every parasitic rat has found their way to the voting booth to vote to get their piece of “free government cheese”, just as they did in Venezuela and Cuba, and now suffer the poisonous consequences of their actions.

So only wealthy land owners should be allowed to vote…not those down on their luck struggling to get buy…those needing a piece of government cheese should not be voting…or if they do…they should be vilified? Very telling.