The big freaken MSM lie: they want to overturn the election

.

For starters, I suggest those interested in the subject, should Google “want to overturn the 2020 election” and you will probably find approximately 55,700,000 results (0.38 seconds), which is what I found. But is the charge [they want to overturn an election] really accurate as claimed by our mainstream media?

According to an article published last month, UPDATE: 21 States Now Support Texas SCOTUS Lawsuit, 42% of America to Sue 8% of America, the lawsuit merely asks the Supreme Court to hear the Texas BILL OF COMPLAINT, which basically asks if specific constitutional provisions have been violated by Defendant States, to declare that Defendant States administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Is this really asking to “overturn an election”, or asking that the rules of our democratic system be adhered to and enforced by our Supreme Court?

Of course, saying that someone wants to overturn the election implies they are attempting to undermine our democratic system ____ a charge which is very serious indeed ___ but wrongfully casts all those who merely seek a corruption free election ___ and an election in compliance with the protections found in our written Constitution ___ in a very bad light.

And so, our Fifth Column MSM and their Yellow Journalist, who have unjustly attacked President Trump for four long years, and those who are comfortable with ignoring the rule of law when it suites their notoriously evil political purposes, are quick to obscure the issue by falsely asserting those wanting to follow the rule of law are attacking our democratic system, and must be severely dealt with and punished.

The latest call for punishment is to “expel House Republicans” LINK who dared to question the legitimacy of the election in the Defendant States named in the Texas lawsuit.

“A first-term Democratic lawmaker, Rep. Cori Bush of Missouri, is seeking sanctions that could include a political death penalty for Republican House members who contested electoral votes sent in by states that finalized Joe Biden’s defeat of President Trump.”

I sincerely suspect that had the Supreme Court done its job, and heard the Texas case and ruled upon its particulars, and constructed an appropriate remedy, the vast majority of Trump’s 75 million voters would have accepted the court’s ruling and moved on, and today’s dangerous political environment may very well have been side-stepped.

JWK

MLK was spot on when he said . . . “A riot is the language of the unheard”.

3 Likes

States don’t have the right to tell other States how to run their elections.

2 Likes

Yes since the specific relief they sought was to throw out the votes of those states and have the Republican legislatures of those states choose the electors, they were seeking to overturn the election.

This fact isn’t hidden by your usual massive walls of text.

4 Likes

It is a big lie…one that they been pushing for few weeks now.

What we are demanding is accountability and they know it.

2 Likes

No…Trump was demanding votes be thrown out or rules be changed so legislatures would choose electors that would vote for him and make him President.

That’s overturning the election no matter how many euphemisms you use to pretend otherwise.

1 Like

Why are you brining up Trump? We are talking about the Texas lawsuit.

From the OP:

According to an article published last month, UPDATE: 21 States Now Support Texas SCOTUS Lawsuit, 42% of America to Sue 8% of America, the lawsuit merely asks the Supreme Court to hear the Texas BILL OF COMPLAINT, which basically asks if specific constitutional provisions have been violated by Defendant States, to declare that Defendant States administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

JWK

MLK was spot on when he said . . . "A riot is the language of the unheard".

:roll_eyes:

The Texas BILL OF COMPLAINT, basically asks if specific constitutional provisions have been violated by Defendant States, to declare said States administered the 2020 presidential election in violation of the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Are you suggesting the Supreme Court could not fashion ground rules to address existing corruption in federal elections, and enforce Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, and the 14th Amendment ?

JWK

You bet Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff have won. Every parasitic rat has found their way to the voting booth to vote to get their piece of “free government cheese”, just as they did in Venezuela and Cuba, and now suffer the poisonous consequences of their actions.

Hard to gin up the kind of outrage necessary to push the hard left agenda if you stick to the truth.

True or not nearly half the country has serious doubts as to the legitimacy of our last election and wants answers.

That isn’t trying to “overturn the results of an election” it’s wanting to ensure those results are accurate.

2 Likes

Stop.

This is literally what Trump wanted from The Georgia SOS and Pence.

Trump told his followers that he wanted Pence to accept some electors and reject others so he can win.

Try following the conversation. Nobody but you mentioned Trump.

Stop.

True or not nearly half the country has serious doubts as to the legitimacy of our last election and wants answers.

That isn’t trying to “overturn the results of an election” it’s wanting to ensure those results are accurate.

I’m telling you it is about overturning the election. It’s what Trump wanted. So his followers are following.

Are you trying to say that Trump had nothing to do with his supporters believing the election was stolen and needed to overturn it?

Oh, well that’s entirely different since YOU’RE telling us that’s what it’s all about.

:joy: :grinning: :joy:

No, Trump is and you are trying to revise history.

Are you suggesting that Trump didn’t tell his supporters that he wanted Pence to reject electors? That he didn’t tell the Georgia SOS to “find” votes?

We’re not talking about Trump at all. Pay attention.

You are attempting to remove the main catalyst and say it was something else.

That’s false.

It was all about overturning the election. Trump told them so.

No, you’re just ranting about Trump while we’re having a conversation about something else.

4 Likes

I seriously doubt there was enough funny business going on to change the results of the election.

I stIll want it looked at and the funny business addressed. I accept that even without the weird thing some states did that Biden would still be president. But that doesn’t mean I have to like or tolerate those things going on in the first place.

It’s like a ref making some questionable calls during a game. You don’t just say “well the other team would have won anyways even without those calls so…meh.” You get to the bottom of it to prevent it from happening again another time when it might matter.

4 Likes

Your claim is not based in reality…

This claim

It’s literally what Trump wanted Georgia and Pence to do.

Learn to follow the conversation. We’re discussing the Texas Lawsuit.

Which part of this post was about the lawsuit?