I’ll go with 50/50…
Interesting. Do you not work for a business?
it wouldnt be at their expense. it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
Really? So take what we give you and like it…
It wouldn’t?. .Less regulation, get rid of unions…they could even get rid of OSHA… …
Earn what you wish for and enjoy it.
thinkingman:it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
Really? So take what we give you and like it…
huh? i’m not saying that
thinkingman:it wouldnt be at their expense
It wouldn’t?. .Less regulation, get rid of unions…they could even get rid of OSHA… …
no. it wouldnt
theres no justification for your “awfulizing” here
Scratch: thinkingman:it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
Really? So take what we give you and like it…
Earn what you wish for and enjoy it.
without blaming it on someone else
not everyone’s a “winner of life’s lottery”
—Dick Durbin. level 10 dumbass
Samson_Corwell:The reasoning is you can either have economic power or political power, but not both.
this is not about “power”
it’s about having a stake in the election’s outcome.
people on the dole will always keep relecting those who provide for them off the backs of those who succeed, and produce
I am making it about power.
Scratch:And people who own businesses will keep voting in those that are business friendly at the expense of others that don’t. How is that any better?
it wouldnt be at their expense. it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
Ahh. I see what’s happening here. All you need to do discount business-friendly policies as not being at anyone else’s expense and, magically, none if them are. Instant water, just add water.
Scratch:And people who own businesses will keep voting in those that are business friendly at the expense of others that don’t. How is that any better?
it wouldnt be at their expense. it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
How very gracious to assume you know what’s best for others, Mr. Paternalist.
thinkingman: Scratch:And people who own businesses will keep voting in those that are business friendly at the expense of others that don’t. How is that any better?
it wouldnt be at their expense. it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
How very gracious to assume you know what’s best for others, Mr. Paternalist.
oh dear.
all about lil ol moi these days
thinkingman: Scratch:And people who own businesses will keep voting in those that are business friendly at the expense of others that don’t. How is that any better?
it wouldnt be at their expense. it would be to their benefit too. assuming they like jobs
Ahh. I see what’s happening here. All you need to do discount business-friendly policies as not being at anyone else’s expense and, magically, none if them are. Instant water, just add water.
no sir just add effort, not depend on gov’t, and you’ll get results.
it’s a very simple formula
too simple nowadays i guess
How very gracious to assume you know what’s best for others, Mr. Paternalist.
Am I being held liable for “others”?
Samson_Corwell:How very gracious to assume you know what’s best for others, Mr. Paternalist.
Am I being held liable for “others”?
Pardon?
Collectivist rationalization
not entirely certain, but i think the poorest men elected president were lincoln and if you listen to leftists, trump. and lincoln wasn’t “poor”
Texas does it again…
Samsung Elec picks Taylor, Texas as new $17 bln U.S. chip plant site
Thanks Trump
Scratch:I’ll go with 50/50…
Interesting. Do you not work for a business?
Lost a childhood friend over this a few years back. He got a bad case of watching too much msnbc and was suddenly spouting the businesses are evil exploiter thing. And I said, wait, you own a business, are you evil? And he said, well not me, I take care of my employees. I had a good laugh, never heard from him again.