Supreme Court Worship Wins

So happy to see this case correctly adjudicated. Roberts showed himself again to be a lib, but played it off by saying that the case could be revisited once the state renewed the restrictions on the church.

It is horrendous to me to say a casino can open, or a BLM protest can happen, but a church must close and a Trump rally is killing people.

If the dems hadnt made such a political weapon of this whole issue, they might have gotten more public support. And it was all so stupid. Things like fining families 500 dollars if they drove their car into a parking lot and heard an Easter message over their radio.

Since today is Thanksgiving, I give thanks for Justice Barrette. Without her, the libs would have won.


I guess they’ll use this ruling to outlaw protests.

I disagree that he showed himself to be a lib. He once again showed he cares more about his legacy than the law.

Who will? Why do you say that?

Maybe…but he swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and citizens have the right to peacefully assemble. After his ruling on a fine being a tax and doing back flips to pass the ACA, I will never look at him as a conservative again.

1 Like

He’s not a conservative at all.

What he’s trying to do is have it both ways, and when he can’t he tries not to hear the case.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

1 Like

He’s as much a lib as the other 3.

Court is 5-4 at the moment not 6-3. Imo.


Well this is a win for the medical insurance business all these new COVID cases.


They have the right to the free exercise of their religion as well.

Bet the arrogant Cuomo is beside himself. :grin:

Well… meme time.


Love it! :+1: :joy: :joy: :joy:

1 Like

And of course

The American Civil Liberties Union condemned the decision and warned it could “undermine New York’s efforts to curb the pandemic.”

The Roberts court will be out of balance until Clancy resigns.


I made a thread on this point not that long ago. Can someone see what percent of the time he sides with Thomas and Alito vs Sotomayor and Kagan?

Fundamental lack of understanding of the function of the SCOTUS.

1 Like

Hi Allan;

What does this mean? How will it improve when “Clancy” resigns?

Either a lib will be appointed or baring that a 4-4 court.


I understand fully.

Final arbiter.


No, you really don’t. And you refuse to.