We are changing the parameters of what you are arguing.
Arbery was chased and murdered for a perceived property crime. For robbing a place where no one was.
If someone enters one’s home with malice while it is occupied then that is more than a property crime. It is a physical threat.
Oh. The active shooter that they were chasing.
Nope.
I disagree, he is smart enough to play to the idiocy of the dullards who make up his following.
And there you have it.
The prosecutor kept trying that tactic and it will work for you as well as it worked for him.
Who totally sold out comedy and his own talent to become a partisan state propagandist. Kids on youtube beat his ratings lol.
Hardly an achievement
No, the armed kid who was running away.
What does the OP have to do with “quartering” or Colbert wanting to change self-defense laws, especially when self-defense is an age-old common law right?
What is your mission in the thread with regard to the OP?
JWK
That is correct. Rittenhouse was acting in self defense.
If he had been subdued and killed… the other people would have have been acting in self defense against him… because they didn’t know that Rittenhouse was acting in self defense…. Only that he was shooting.
Is this a comedy routine?
You lose the self defense the moment you chase. But you knew that.
I know.
Rittenhouse lived.
If he had been killed, he wouldn’t be able to tell his side of the story.
No, not an achievement, an act of self career preservation. Could you imagine what would happen to his audience had he taken a more rational position?
It’s trolling.
He wouldn’t need to, there was ample video and other witnesses to the event, even a journalist tagging along.
The dude you linked to is “The Quartering”.
Agreed.
The video told Rittenhouse’s “side of the story”.
Hannity Community
The official community forum of Sean Hannity. Join the conversation with fellow conservatives on the issues that matter most.