Stephen Colbert wants to change self-defense laws

The same distinction as in Arbery actually. The cops would have been but not you.

1 Like

Huh?

image

JWK

It is absolutely shameful that those in our mainstream media and Hollywood crowd, having achieved fame, fortune and great success under a free market, free enterprise system, now work to destroy that system and impose a notoriously evil, Cuban style government, on America’s future generation.

No.

gamergate

Physical and bodily threats are a different matter than property crime.

Let’s leave families out of it.

Who you posted to has made a name complaining about how feminists ruined comic books.

He is a professional whiner.

I think they would if they heard the shot, chased him and he turned and aimed at them. It would be a legal shoot. But he wouldn’t have, he would have just obeyed their lawful order to stop instead.

1 Like

Have to think about them beforehand.

No, thankfully there were only a few chuckleheads stupid enough to attack the armed kid running away.

6 Likes

Oh … the active shooter.

Are you talking about Stephen Colbert?

JWK

1 Like

And in the Arbery case the three guys thought he was a criminal? It’s the law that matters not what is supposedly in someone’s mind.

1 Like

Really how can tell someone breaking in your house is just gonna leave once they have your Xbox?

No. The Quartering.

Colbert is one of the most decent people in the entertainment industry.

Of course.

And if they “just show up”, they have the authority to disarm him. But not just shoot him.

No, the moronic aggressors chasing down the armed kid running away.

1 Like

Is a dumbass

2 Likes

Never was. Only shot in defense when attacked.
And there was likely only one completely manic lunatic like Rosenbaum out there to initiate the whole sequence. Not that there weren’t other rioters and arsonists, but not as crazed as he was.

1 Like

That would explain the familiarity.