Why would Colbert want to deny Stephen Spencer the right to self-defense and protect white racists?
JWK
It is absolutely shameful that those in our mainstream media and Hollywood crowd, having achieved fame, fortune and great success under a free market, free enterprise system, now work to destroy that system and impose a notoriously evil, Cuban style government, on America’s future generation.
I can remember when people actually watched late night shows, mostly if they couldn’t sleep. Now those shows have become political advertisements…exempt, of course, from all funding laws.
Nobody watches the MSM anymore, except politicians and really old people. Their days are done. Colbert doesn’t reach a small fraction of the people Joe Rogan or Tim Pool or many other alternate media people do.
I’ll watch the video after this post. On Rittenhouse, I cannot for the life of me understand how people were against Rittenhouse after watching that video. But i’ll admit that I never followed the case. I just watched the video.
I think that we have a problem that if Anthony Huber had subdued and killed Rittenhouse, he could have claimed that he was acting in self defense against an active shooter and would likely have gotten off.
It is looking more and more that the law protects the person who survives.
Not true. Self defense went away when he initiated the attack. Much like the Arbery case. It is amazing you guys can’t understand the difference between the attacked and the attacker.
If you are gonna subdue someone or try a citizens arrest you better be damn sure you are correct and not use more force then necessarily. Perfect example in the Arbery case.
