They are already driving weapons.
3 Likes
You seem to be implying that someone would use a car as a weapon to run down and kill otherwise innocent people.
Like that would ever happen.
1 Like
Well you know, tragic accidents happen
In Left wing ideology there’s the victim class, which essentially includes all non whites, and then there’s the privileged class, which essentially includes all whites. As long as someone in the victim class is not doing anything in opposition to their ideology, that victim is never truly at fault.
2 Likes
Only scary black assault skirts.
1 Like
Most murders where the perpetrator doesn’t know the victim begin as property crimes.
The vast majority of murders are crimes of passions, where the murderer and victim have some sort of relationship or at least know each other.
Murders where the perpetrator doesn’t know the victim or victims usually start as break ins. They aren’t going to there to commit murder, but they end up doing so for one reason or another.
So yes. Property crime is inherently life threatening because you cannot know what their other intentions are.
By the way, the cops weren’t doing their jobs in this circumstance. Rittenhouse shouldn’t have had to put out a fire. The cops should have been doing their ■■■■■■■ jobs and getting the riot under control.
2 Likes
Are you two are really trying to equate a guy bringing a gun to a riot with a woman being raped? Getting that desperate are ya?..lol
I think it’s more an observation that woman wearing something doesn’t provoke normal people into raping her, just as a guy carying a gun doesn’t provoke normal people into chasing and attacking him.
Of course there are a few sick, violent and deranged exceptions to this rule. But even in those few cases, blame doesn’t lie on the woman or the guy…it lies with the sick, violent and deranged aggressor.
2 Likes
He was in the middle mob that was rioting, they weren’t normal people. To use your rape example…It would be like a woman going to hang out with a group of known rapists, what did she think was going to happen?
We can certainly agree on that, not normal people. Violent deranged misfits sure, certainly not normal.
So, in your mind, it’s the woman’s fault.
Ok, you go with that.
If she goes to hang out with a group of known rapists? You actually think she should take no responsibility for putting herself in that situation?
Well, there’s only 15 states with Constitutional Carry. Let’s see what happens when it’s all 50.
But hey, if I’m wrong, I’m wrong.
I tend to lay the blame on the person who commits the heinous act, not the victim of the act.
But hey, I’m a bit old school like that…maybe I’m not woke enough?
2 Likes
Are you kidding? Nobody loses money betting on the continued stupidity of the American people.
By your faulty logic, gang shooting shootings should be down, year over year, as they atrit out.
It isn’t happening.
You’ve been wrong for 17 years. Scientifically.
3 Likes
Not just the cops but every law abiding man in the community should have been out there with him.
3 Likes
Actually, sociology believes it is. We have essentially domesticed ourselves.
True, stupidity seems to be a perpetual problem in this country. And I’m I not saying more guns would solve this problem, but perhaps it would provide idiots a bit more pause to reflect on their stupidity before acting on it.
Oh, come on now…it’s not like gangbangers rely on constitutional or ANY legal form of carry to wander the streets strapped. Making it easier for decent normal people to carry will have no effect on gangbangers or other misfits who ignore laws…outside of giving their victims better odds.
2 Likes
Those same idiots will also have guns.
Considering gangbangers and other criminally minded violent misfits, those idiots already have guns. Take for instance that chucklehead Grosskreutz, good thing Rittenhouse also had a gun or that clown may have killed him.
2 Likes
