Lol
Nicely done.
2 Likes
Got it. I suppose you’re not a fan of shock and awe. Most of the Trump fans I know well are fairly well defended against reality. I worry more about those affected by policies than those affected by news.
1 Like
Do you have an idea what the “nude selfie” story is about. I see that the lawyers defending a firm that Mueller has indicted for sponsoring Russian trolls is protesting their indictment in court… that’s what defendants do. And they mentioned something about Mueller obtaining a nude selfie. But other than titillation value – what’s the importance.
I am guessing that if you had the power to seize a hundred cell phones from American adults chosen at random, you would end up with more than one nude photo. So what?
The so what is more interesting if, say you collected them in Orange County as opposed to Paducah, KY. At least I’d be more interested.
I admit that this is just a thread of a clue. I don’t necessarily agree with Cohen’s denial (since what he tweets isn’t under oath), but I really can’t see any other way this would have happened without something actually going on.
Cohen’s denial was weird on at least two counts.
- It was unnecessary
- It teased the reader about Cohen having heard good things about Prague in the Spring and “Mueller knows everything.”
Yesterday I was teasing about only have proof that Cohen’s cell phone was in Prague but not that we was there, but now I start to wonder that a man with sixteen cell phones might well have leant a phone that contained a set of important numbers or codes to someone else, if they were going to a meeting in Prague. And did the people in Prague know the actual identity of the person with whom they met? (This is starting to sound like a great spy story.)
Now, AND I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP, Donald Trump Jr. speaks Czech fluently.
3 Likes
Why would anyone have wanted to clone his phone, at that time?
Credible to you <> happened
They haven’t proved the “illegal collusion” thing yet. That’s the point. Yes, the dossier was partly correct. Trump did go to Moscow once.
If I prove someone was in Chicago, that doesn’t prove he committed a robbery there.
The Dossier has been proven right on multiple levels. Why minimize this basic fact?
I will say it again…if you are going to make allegations like that in a dossier, you surround it with a true background, not something that can be easily disproved. Steele is not an amateur at this.
The better question is “Why can the most innocuous things be proven correct but the main accusations never seem to be proven”?
That is the minimization I’m discussing. The main accusations have been proven correct. The GRU did engage in a multi-pronged attack on the DNC, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and were doing so in a concerted effort to assist Donald Trump become the President of the United States. Multiple Russians were indicted for their criminal actions by the SCO, and that were first uncovered by Christopher Steele and his series of memos that made up the Dossier.
7 Likes
What we still do not know though, is whether or not any Americans were assisting them in these crimes against the United States.
You must be very good at yoga.
1 Like
Very well. The collusion part then. Still waiting for the collusion.
Collusion is just a catch-all term for a litany of crimes. Conspiracy being the most obvious one. Time will tell on this front. But Roger Stone is likely very well a potential “colluder” if you will.
2 Likes
I totally forgot he exposed the corruption in FIFA. That was a good bit of work.
1 Like
If the person in question vehemently denied ever having gone to Chicago, it makes it suspicious when it’s discovered they actually did go there.
Because they knew about the Mueller investigation before it even happened?
2 Likes
This is terrible logic.
It is credible to me precisely because a number of things documented in it have been proven to have happened.
