This article has nothing to do with the overall economy and nothing to do with the efficacy of so-called trickle down economics. It’s about a dispute between the workers and management regarding their contract.
One of the things the steel company is trying to do is rework the retirement/insurance of retired employees. They’ve already performed their tasks and earned this…so how can a company attempt to renegotiate these things? Is this behavior not illegal?
ArcelorMittal is trying to cut costs to keep up with their US compeditirs, and they are targeting their employee benefits. Here is a statement by ArcelorMittal where they explain why they are finding themselves needing to cut costs:
"We still struggle with global overcapacity, and imports continue to be of concern," Brett said. "New steel mills are being built in our country, and mini-mills are expanding both their capacity and capability. In fact, some sophisticated steels that were once only available through integrated manufacturers can now be produced by mini-mills, thanks to advancing technologies. In the past 10 years, integrated mills have lost another 10 percent of market share to mini-mills, which now account for 70 percent of the market. This fact highlights our continuous need to be cost competitive."
ArcelorMittal is feeling the pinch from US competitors. They used to have a little bit of a monopoly, but due to the growing economy more steel mills are being created, and established mills have expanded their production capabilities.
BTW. The OP jumped to the wrong conclusions, this is occurring because the economy is growing. Market pressures are leveling the playing field between the small steel companies and the well established industry leaders, this is how our capitalist system works.
The steel industry is a small portion of the entire US economy. Regarding the economic situation of the steel companies it may simply be the case that one good year or half a year doesn’t erase 10 bad or so-so years. But I’ll also say good for the workers to fight for what they believe.
Regarding the rational of so-called trickle down economics or more noteably Supply side Economics, as I understand it, is that a growing and vibrant private sector economy is the best thing for workers and theoretically should increase wealth. Being that economies are very complex with many “moving parts” (so to speak) it doesn’t always work out that way for everyone and every industry unless that industry is part of government of course.
The thing is that much of the political Liberal philosophy is that companies are always the “bad guy” plain and simple. There are good guys and there are bad guys one not need to think beyond that.