Ummmmmmmmmm
1 Like
That was 2000 years ago
1 Like
The fact that your usual news sources didn’t tell you about it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, only that they didn’t think it was news you should hear.
“White asylum seekers from South Africa who try to claim are told that South Africa is a safe country and therefore they cannot claim asylum, yet blacks are accepted without question. Furthermore the ANC regime aggressively intervenes in all white asylum applications WORLDWIDE. Making the notion of asylum and the United Nations a mockery…
Why this racist discrimination?
White asylum seekers from South Africa are already fleeing from discrimination where there are over a hundred laws preventing whites from access to jobs, schools, Universities, welfare, etc. etc.
There is also the on-going disproportionate murder rate of whites and specifically white farmers.”
https://sa-news.com/why-is-america-taking-black-refugees-from-south-africa-but-not-whites/
My advice to people is to listen to what the Jews have to say about it.
1 Like
Well that’s complicated.
Oh fine, hell with the red people then. 
Well in my previous construct the red people hadn’t been discovered yet🤣
1 Like
Well they don’t have souls. Oh wait you said red not redhead
4 Likes
South Africa and its supporters are active worldwide to,reject that their system is discriminatory or that white South Africans are at risk.
“The case of a white South African granted refugee protection in Canada over fear of his country’s black majority has been overturned and his appeal rejected, clearing the way for a return to his homeland, where his claims sparked an angry furor and backlash against Canada.
Article content
In 2009, an international uproar greeted Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board decision that Brandon Huntley, a white citizen of South Africa, had a “well-founded fear of persecution on the ground of his race” and the South Africa government had “indifference or inability or unwillingness … to protect white South Africans from persecution by African South Africans.”
That decision was called “perverse” by Ottawa and “racist” by South Africa’s government. Politicians, newspaper editorials and talk radio in South Africa angrily refuted Mr. Huntley’s claims and attacked the “
It’s ok to have special laws for them, and to reject their right to own land. They have dominated control of the finances of the country and have a too prominent part in the professions. There fore, special laws are needed to limit their control in defense of equity.”
Now am I talking about the defense of laws about Jews in Germany in the thirties or the South African government today?
1 Like
That’s racist. Gingers are black people now. 
2 Likes
Very dangerous times for certain ethnicities. A lot of hatred has been rekindled these last couple of decades. It’s en vogue.
Yes.
Think about where the Caucasus are … which is the origin of the word "Caucasian … are.
Red people (American indigenous people) are subset of Asians, as are Polynesians.
1 Like
2 Likes
A side effect of the woke movement.
1 Like
Some folks have that good skin. Whoever that is in that picture has that good skin.
2 Likes
Perfection in that skin.
No one is white.
