So why hasn't libs called Michael Horowitz to testify in front of congress?

I believe the Times. You should too. They’ve been right more than Trump.

Very good point. Looks like they laid down flat on the ground and let Comey drive his Camaro back and forth and back and forth right over them

Proof is in the OP.

3 Likes

Sorry…I’ve read the times from about mid term of Carter presidency to after Clinton second term just about every day. I ensure you times is nothing more then progandist back then and outright promoting false info now.

And I didn’t have to hear about it from a source…I’ve seen it with my own eyes that change.

What you cite has nothing to do with news accuracy. The media has caught Trump’s lies and proven them to be false. That’s what you call news accuracy. It’s not anti-Trump. It’s what he’s doing.

And it’s what today journalist do…lie. Anything to achieve end game.

And what’s their end game?

1 Like

Because most Dem in congress are not liberals but right wing wannabes. It odd that most Trump supporters hate them when they are more like GOP then they are progressives. Clinton was Queen of Capitalist Greed and yet you all think she was a socialist. How sad the low level of intellect that the GOP has breed into the party.

1 Like

Yeah yeah…nice deflection. Either way you all are going to nominate a socialist this time. A hardcore socialist at that.

You might want to stop listening to lies of Trump admin and the King himself. CNN is not nor has ever been a left wing media. They are a corporate(which is conservative minded) owned mouth piece for the rich and establishment DC. That is rigt wing more than left wing. There is no economic policy that CNN supports that is even close to progressives. CNN is more right wing and at least a centrist news outlet.

The grammar in the thread title is breaking my brain.

Why has not libs called arglebarglebaahh

3 Likes

Unlike GOP who nominated a NYC elite Limousin Liberal cause most seem to uneducated to realise Trump has been running cons his whole adult life.

“Allegedly”? The report stated he broke many FBI rules to leak information that was related to ongoing investigations. The report stated that he knew full well such information was not allowed to be released. The report then lectures about leaking information because of your personal political opinions.
What is allegedly in all of that?
As was recently said about another incident “read the report”.

The former head of the FBI breaks about every rule there exists in the FBI and Congress doesn’t want to know more about what has been gong on?
But then, if you are going to go after someone for obstructing an investigation, maybe it isn’t a good idea to show that that investigation was politically motivated to begin with.

1 Like

Good…

Who gave them everything he said he would or is trying to.

The truth (as reported by the New York Times, WashPost, CNN, etc.) hurts, doesn’t it?

And you’re going to nominate a complete phony and a shyster who is taking you for everything you’ve got. Only you don’t know it.

Odd comment, given that Trump has given government handouts to farmers, tried to order companies where they can and can’t do business, and outright stated that his healthcare plan would cover everyone with the government picking up the tab for those who couldn’t afford it.

2 Likes

Lets keep this thread on track.

So why haven’t democrats brought him in?

It’s right there in link in ems OP.

2 Likes

Because minority Republican congressman crying is meaningless.

Hope for their destructions all em hold dear.

:grin:

:heart:

2 Likes

They can’t. They are gong after Trump for attempted obstruction of an investigation. The Comey investigation shows the illegitimate beginnings of the Mueller investigation and that it actually was, from the beginning, an attempt to get Trump. Part of a downer when you need to show a corrupt attempt to stop a corrupt investigation.