Looks like other nations will do what they want regarding fossil fuels:
“The support for fossil fuels from seven of the world’s richest nations included measures to remove or downgrade environmental regulations as well as direct funding of oil, gas and coal.”
"In most cases, money provided for fossil fuel industries was given with no strings attached, rather than with conditions requiring a reduction in emissions or pollution. The analysis found that eight in every 10 dollars spent on non-renewable energy came without conditions.
This included lifelines that were thrown to the aviation and car industries, which received $115bn from the G7 countries. Of that money, 80% was given with no attempt to force the sectors to cut their emissions in return for the support."
“Under the Paris Agreement, each country must determine, plan, and regularly report on the contribution that it undertakes to mitigate global warming. No mechanism forces a country to set a specific emissions target by a specific date, but each target should go beyond previously set targets.”
I don’t think we can draw any longterm policy conclusions based on emergency stimulus given to gas and automobile companies that were hit hard by a global pandemic.
I don’t disgree in general, but the point I was trying to make is that we can’t take the fact that a lot of money was given to gas and auto companies (a short-term stimulus to help out during a pandemic-induced economic downturn) and extrapolate that to mean they will get that level of funding relative to “green” companies every year.
Do you not understand how the Paris Accord works? Do you not understand the stages required to replace fossil fuels? Do you not understand the number of years it will take to have green energy replacements in use in significant quantities?