YES! Now youâre getting it!
Big problem with that logic: Shapiro himself created that divide in his argument to a conservative Brit. Shapiro assumed that Neil was a liberal Brit, not a conservative Brit.
He doesnât seem to be able to back up his positions and then gets angry on being asked questions on his position.Neil isnât even an aggressive interviewer compared to some on the BBC,like you say,he didnât do his homework and made himself look pathetic.
After watching the interview I have to disagree with the way TYT were framing what happened. This unknown hack of a British âjournalistâ owes Ben Shapiro an apology for the way he conducted himself. Every single question he posed to Shapiro was a gotcha question. If the interviewer was trying to be fair he would have stuck to fawning questions about the book. If I was Shapiro I would have walked out of the interview the minute the bias started seeping through in the questions. Frankly, this looks bad on the entire UK. They should be ashamed to support this man by allowing him a country to live in.
Well, according to Ben Shapiro, heâs very well known.
I donât think that the way the questions was framed âdetermined him to be a leftist and nothing moreâ-the problem was that Shapiro does what he does best-when he senses a point he can dwell on and hammer really hard, he just beats the poor horse to death, and thatâs what happened here. I donât have a problem saying that the interviewer was clearly posting the query in a provocative way-but then Ben acted in a way that would have gotten him a time out or silence here. He âattacked the poster and not the post.â Plays the victim. Big lib media is out to get you. Blah blah blah.
Now, if he were told that this was going to be a book tour interview and then they came at him like this-I would say thatâs unfair, but Ben sorta chest thumps a lot, so he shouldnât be surprised when things like this happen.
If Shapiro didnât wallow so deeply in this petulant political culture himself, then it might be a little easier to feel like he was treated unfairly.
I looked up Conservative Party of Britian. Wiki labels them as a centre-right party.
Was Margaret Thatcher a conservative or a liberal? How about Winston Churchhill?
Ok. Here you are being a scheople. Baa.
Shapiro did seem to say that it was unfair to use Shapiroâs own comments in the questions.
How do you reckon Shapiro would have gone if he had been interviewed by Kay Burley?
Looks like you fell for it tooâŚ
Thatâs correct. I reviewed the interview again, and Neil doesnât provide a liberal framing. Neil himself told him that he was playing devilâs advocate and was asking to respond to the criticism.
At least Shapiro, after actually doing some research, apologizedâŚdonât think weâll see that hereâŚwe know who keeps diggingâŚ
No, it was not. He was trying to challenge him on his positions and respond to criticisms, as he mapped out in the interview. Shapiroâs argument was not âthese are logic fallaciesâ, it was about creating diversions and trying to turn the table on the interviewer. He was not in the business of answering his questions.
And yet again we have someone on these boards waltzing into a thread, doesnât have the slightest idea what heâs talking about, and yet canât wait to show off his ignorance.
This phenomenon is fascinating to me.
I am not a big fan of Shapiroâs, but when I first saw links to this interview, words like âtantrumâ, âstormed offâ, âtriggeredâ to describe Shapiro were used. So I watched the entire interview.
My reaction - I think Shapiro is on an interview tour to promote a book that came out in the past few months. The way these interviews are generally, and professionally, conducted is to perhaps ask a few general questions for the benefit of the audience who might not know the interviewed subject, and then get into the content of the book. The BBC host didnât seem interested in discussing the book (frankly, there are few hosts that seem to have actually read the book when interviewing an author) and instead brought up Shapiroâs past tweets, Georgiaâs abortion legislation (about which he misstated information - not surprising since many media outlets did the same) and Shapiroâs decision to leave Breitbart.
Shapiro - understandably IMHO - became frustrated with what he believed was a book tour interview turning into an interview about past tweet, his conservative position on issues, and so on. If you have ever watched Shapiro speak to groups - usually college - where there are a high percentage of political opponents in the audience, you see that he handles their questions quite well because why heâs there is clear from the outset. In this case, Shapiro realized heâd been baited-and-switched, seemed frustrated and finally thanked the guy for his time and ended the interview.
In your long thread you basically confirmed the point that he expected a typical American RW softball interviewâŚbut thatâs not how itâs done in the UKâŚand he failedâŚmiserably.
Shapiro did seem to say that it was unfair to use Shapiroâs own comments in the questions.
How do you reckon Shapiro would have gone if he had been interviewed by Kay Burley?
Not well at all
Its the way tv political journalism works here,interviewers usually take a contrarian position and people have to explain their views,From what I have seen your tv is similar in that regard.
Anyone who is honest understands the people of the world are not bifurcated into one of two philosophical groups where if you donât have purity of belief on every single issue youâre immediately on the opposite end of the spectrum.
Especially in Europe and the UK who are a bunch of global warming nut-jobs, thatâs the mark of a liberal for sure!!
So in sum, what you are saying is Ben Shapiro is not really an excellent debater but can only perform well when heâs meticulously prepared and is aware of everything thatâs going to be thrown at him.
Thanks for your honesty.
Especially in Europe and the UK who are a bunch of global warming nut-jobs, thatâs the mark of a liberal for sure!!
And player number two rushes in to do the same thing player number one does.
So many people that are absolutely sure they KNOW something.
Dunning Kruger on a massive scaleâŚ