Do you support law-abiding citizens to won guns?
Do you support Joe Biden wanting to ban some handguns?
Do you support a gun ban like the ones in Australia, England, and Canada?
I only support technological approaches such as databases that can be searched with algorithms.
Since it’s always the guy that everyone knew was crazy, it should be possible to quantify these behaviors and automatically flag people for further observation based on their posting history, law enforcement paper trails, and gun purchases.
Is there a constitutional issue with it?
Otherwise, I can see it eventually becoming other people’s business. That information would be very valuable for building a digital paper trail.
The more shooters fed into the system, the better it gets. I don’t think it’s problematic. There has to be a pattern because the perpetrators are rarely surprising, even to the human gut.
If there is any flex in the constitutional issue, the value of the information will eventually overcome political resistance.
That’s for local law enforcement to figure out. The database’s job is done once it flags a white hot profile. They have a full summary of someone exhibiting the same behaviors we always hear about after the shooting, so they can sus out whether or not he’s a threat on their own.
My intention is to eliminate the excuse that law enforcement didn’t see it coming when everyone else around the person knows they’re a timebomb
I’d like to see universal background checks and raising the age on assault rifles to 21. Along with that, we also need to address the societal issues that are making mass shootings so prevalent in our country.
What value is the information? You haven’t explained that? For example, what value is that information in regards to Buffalo? Uvalde? A street shooting?
Oh no. You don’t get to do that.
Is “everyone else” saying something. Uvalde’s grandfather says he didn’t know the AWG had guns in the same house.