And … ???
Are you and F’Clear saying I referenced THAT story? (FC certainly is. 
)
You get credit for imagination.
Good analysis.
I’m just telling you what you said that could have been interpreted as being about Franken.
Not so much imagination as familiarity with current (and past) events.
Right. That. ^^
Another way of saying “imagination”.
F’Clear made up something. Be smart enough not to roll in that sty with him by defending the fabrication.
Didn’t the House already pass a bill requiring paper ballots that is sitting on McConnell’s desk.
Don’t states determine that?
For Federal elections?
We have state and federal laws for elections. The answer to your question is yes, but.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6093
Yeah, the Constitution though. The elections clause refers to congressional elections.
And just because it’s been introduced doesn’t mean much. Unfortunately.
You’re right though, it’s complicated.
You could have mentioned it in passing that’s fine.
But what i said isn’t a fabrication. Lol. Its an interpretation
But anyway good post
So who did you mean by that reference then?
The fabrication is that I referenced that specific story.
What reference?
Referencing something points back to something. I mentioned something I don’t want to happen in the future.
Who? Whoever will do it in some future election.
So your story is that yours was a fabricated situation that you don’t want happening in the future and not connected in any way to past situations.
Yeah, that’s credible.
1 Like
So … ( insert something I didn’t say …)
You libs really seem triggered by this.
Sorry I left off a ?? Sorry to confuse you.
No more triggered than you must be to come up with the story that you were describing a possible future event that you wanted to avoid.
That’s fabrication and imagination most of don’t have the audacity to share.
Clearly triggered. Notably triggered. Disturbingly triggered.
I have seen these symptoms before.
Turned out the sufferer had been triggered. There was no cure.
