Just looking for opinions here? With all the concerns of weaponization of the DOJ should there be a buffer between the president and the DOJ? With a president directly calling for investigations and the attorney general the head law enforcement agency for the United states being able to run interference in investigations . I think there should definitely be more independence here no?
It’s an interesting question given current circumstances though. Even as it relates to the current fight between Congress and the White House over Congressional subpoenas for Executive Branch employees. Or non-employees as it were. The White House is apparently instructing Lewandowski to assert EP today. Congress can refer his contempt to the DOJ. But what if Barr refuses to do anything about it (likely)? Is the Executive Branch truly above oversight and the law?
And how do you propose they be more independent and what branch of government do you thing is should fall under.
You’ve only got three choices:
Legislative - those who make the laws (kind of hard to let them be the investigators as well).
Judicial - those who impose penalties for those who break the laws (kind of hard to let them be the investigators as well)
Executive - the branch that oversee’s how the laws passed by congress are enforced, and then if need be refered to the judicial branch.
So which of the three branches to you propose be over the Justice Department?
Sure. But I think the debate is moving now. Extending Executive Privilege to non-employees of the Executive Branch is different, isn’t it? Trump is claiming EP over all conversations with all people. Holder was an employee of the Executive Branch. Lewandowski was not.
I’d love to see that as well, and an answer. But it is not going to happen in this reality. Maybe in a bizzaro world perhaps.
Lewandowski is using this experience to bolster his resume to run for Senate in NH. He wants to prove to the cult he is the best and biggliest Trump boot-licker of them all.
To fully investigate you need independence. Other than investigating, the DOJ would have no other power. That is workable whether you believe it or not.
Again, there is NO justice department in the constitution.
You have THREE branches and justice department HAS to fall under one of them.
What branch do you want Justice department under? You can’t just have them out on their own . . . Again the constituion outlines three branches of government. What you are proposing a a fourth.
Constitution grants THREE branches of government. There is NOT a fourth independent branch.
It’s really simple. Tell what of the three branches of government the constitution calls for justice department should be a part of.
You don’t want to do that. They HAVE to be a part of one of the three branches of government. Or either that you can show me where in the constitution an independent fourth branch is authorized.
Their is only one solution. A constitutional amendment making a fourth branch of government. Now how do you propose to write up this so that it is co-equal like the current three branches?