I agree. Thereâs not a whole lot of good that comes from people using lasers without being familiar with the risks associated with them, especially the bargin-bin powerful ones.
Interesting idea - federal agents using deadly force against citizens in US streets. But why stop at lasers?
Throwing rocks or other heavy objects? That has potential to kill or maim.
Fire? Potential to kill or maim.
Fists? Potential to kill or maim.
Logically, federal agents should declare weapons free and engage US citizens with deadly force any time someone comes at them with something that could potentially kill or maim. After all, if these terrorist rabble rousers are peacefully protesting they have nothing to worry about.
Now, what about feds engaging with deadly force with anyone who LOOKS like they could try to harm government agents (e.g. anyone carrying a brick, a laser, a firearm, or raising their hands in a menacing manner)?
(disclaimer - Not poeing, just following a thread of logic to see how it would play out)
On a personal level, yes. Being permanently blinded is grave bodily harm and I wonât lose any sleep over a laser using â â â â â â â â â getting a bullet for it.
In terms of the optics? Iâm not so sure. Never looks good for trained officers firing into a crowd, no matter the cause.
The officers in these situations with rioters should definitely be issued tinted eye protection from here on out, though.
An individual being shot by an officer in self defense is easy to justify and rationalize. They have the same right to self defense that anyone else has in this country.
Firing into a crowd⌠thatâs where things get complicated. The optics matter.
Some of them might be aware, but I doubt most of the culprits are. Theyâre likely blinding themselves too by using them. Cheap green lasers often leak invisible wavelengths that a casual userâs eye protection would not stop. I suspect that most of the lasers being used in protests are similarly dangerous and need to go directly into the trash.