Sheriffs Keeping Their Oaths

Yet these requirements still stand decades later… hmmmm

The meaning of the word was perfectly clear in 1789. And the SCOTUS reclarified it’s meaning in 2008 in Heller. It is not open for you to reinterpret it as you see fit.

They have a sworn duty to uphold and enforce constitutional laws. They have an equal duty to refuse to enforce unconstitutional laws. If you don’t like it, you can take them to court.

That’s nonsense.

Exactly … which is why the Sheriffs are refusing to enforce an unconstitutional law.

You are right. They can be abridged and/or suspended by Due Process.

But passing laws does not constitute Due Process.

Yes it does.

Cite the passage.

By definition, a law that violates a Constitutionally protected right is unconstitutional. There is no Due Process by the enactment of laws.

There is no age limit on owning a gun.

Why to you continue to ignore Due Process?

Where does it say “they are inherently limited.”

Repeating the absurd does not make it any less absurd.

Don’t accuse others of calling you a liar when they didn’t. He said it was dishonest of you to attribute things to him that he never said … which you did.

Yes, but that does not negate the Ruling. The case before them was about short barreled shotguns which had been made illegal (without a permit) by the 1934 National Firearms Act. They ruled that the defendant (Miller) had no Constitutional right to keep and bear a short barreled shotgun because they were not common military issue weapons. They were incorrect in that reasoning (short barreled shotguns were issued and used extensively by the Army during WWI) but it was very clear that the basis for their ruling was that the 2nd Amendment was intended to protect the citizens right to keep and bear military arms.

Yep. They screwed that one up.

Why is due process not an infringement?

Read the Fifth Amendment.

So that means that a law passed by congress and signed by the potus does not infringe.

No … that is not what it means. Try again.

By the courts… You would do well to read up on the presumption of constitutionality…