But they are easier to fuel.
A healthy horse can travel 20-30 miles a day*. EV’s have ten times that range
*less, if you are pushing the horse
A healthy horse can travel 20-30 miles a day*. EV’s have ten times that range
*less, if you are pushing the horse
Uncharged/ unchargable EVs have less range than horses.
They also are fire hazards.
Horse is an emergency food source.
we’ll build more charging stations.
That need power to work.
Pass a law saying, “Your vehicle must be run by a perpetual motion machine. connecting to the grid we own”
Supreme_War_Pig:we’ll build more charging stations.
That need power to work.
Pass a law saying, “Your vehicle must be run by a perpetual motion machine. connecting to the grid we own”
what if his faith is misplaced?
You don’t go from disaster crackhead to multimillionaire with an extremely large company with "misplaced faith.’
It’s strange where you chose to place your faith.
On one hand, you have no faith that we can generate power, despite the fact that we’ve been doing if for a century, but on the other hand, you have faith that Trump will be reinstalled, despite the fact that there is no way to do that.
rp5x5: Supreme_War_Pig:we’ll build more charging stations.
That need power to work.
Pass a law saying, “Your vehicle must be run by a perpetual motion machine. connecting to the grid we own”what if his faith is misplaced?
You don’t go from disaster crackhead to multimillionaire with an extremely large company with "misplaced faith.’
It’s strange where you chose to place your faith.
On one hand, you have no faith that we can generate power, despite the fact that we’ve been doing if for a century, but on the other hand, you have faith that Trump will be reinstalled, despite the fact that there is no way to do that.
Faith is not some superficial “placing”
horses on boats are fun
My guess is you believe that you may have stumbled onto a new and novel argument here.
You haven’t.
A new and novel argument? How new is the constitution?
The idea of an EV mandate is crumbling before it becomes an actual mandate.
“Be not the first by whom the new are tried,
Nor yet the last to lay the old aside.”
― Alexander Pope, An Essay On Criticism
Rest easy, we’ll build more charging stations.
This argument is a dud.
After the grid blows up, y’all can Build Back Better. Right?
Supreme_War_Pig:My guess is you believe that you may have stumbled onto a new and novel argument here.
You haven’t.
A new and novel argument? How new is the constitution?
The idea of an EV mandate is crumbling before it becomes an actual mandate.
“Be not the first by whom the new are tried,
Nor yet the last to lay the old aside.”― Alexander Pope, An Essay On Criticism
His argument is a fail
After the grid blows up, y’all can Build Back Better. Right?
You bet. Why is it gonna blow up?
As of the right to drive, there is no constitutional guarantee. But if some state wants to ban EVs then, by all means, open up that big ol’ can of worms.
It shouldn’t have to be spelled out to a person that they are free to travel, walk, drive a car, truck, or ride in a wheelbarrow or buggy. …
I don’t know of anybody that wants a ban on EV’s, people have a right to buy and drive them. Two of my cousins have them and they are awesome.
A ban on gasoline vehicles is what this administration is working toward.
The courts recognized in the early 1800’s that the right to travel makes America a more perfect union.
Our constitution sustains Americans as free in the pursuit of happiness. The right to travel goes along with that.
Our right to travel is not a right to travel in a manner or to a place that encroaches on another person’s right. - - - like traveling in my car with me is not a right unless I give permission. Entering my house without my permission is also encroaching upon my rights. Entering my house without identifying who a person is also is not a right.
GrandWazoo:And no one is saying that a EV can’t travel between states.
If you are forced to buy an EV because ICEs are no longer sold, your ability to travel is restricted to the distance one could travel with a charged vehicle.
So there are no charging stations? By your logic, an ICE vehicle is restricted to the distance one could travel with a full tank.
His argument is a fail
IMO, it is good advice. I practice it. Suit yourself.
Supreme_War_Pig:Rest easy, we’ll build more charging stations.
This argument is a dud.
After the grid blows up, y’all can Build Back Better. Right?
If the grid blows up, there will be no power for gas pumps. So there’s that.
Supreme_War_Pig:His argument is a fail
IMO, it is good advice. I practice it. Suit yourself.
You clearly don’t even understand the conversation. Go outside and play.
Question. Could limiting our mode of travel (to electric vehicle only) encroach on our “right to travel?”
Does having to drive a car with emissions controls limit your “right to travel”? How about mileage standards or safety standards?
You clearly don’t even understand the conversation. Go outside and play.
Explain it to me genius.
Does having to drive a car with emissions controls limit your “right to travel”? How about mileage standards or safety standards?
How about having no car at all.
Piper: Supreme_War_Pig:Rest easy, we’ll build more charging stations.
This argument is a dud.
After the grid blows up, y’all can Build Back Better. Right?
If the grid blows up, there will be no power for gas pumps. So there’s that.
A small portable generator (or even a solar panel) will run a gas pump, but it will take many hours for it to charge an EV.