It’s a pattern for you - going after the appearance of women whose views you disagree with.
So I presume it’s not Bee’s insults that have you in a twist, but rather her apology?
“BREAKING” = I’m just now creating this thread and I really want your attention"
1 Like
TheDoctorIsIn:
I clicked “reply” on your post - and I’m sure you got a notification about it.
So yes, I was talking to you.
umkay. sorry. still trying to understand this new forum
Blackwolf:
It’s a pattern for you - going after the appearance of women whose views you disagree with.
So I presume it’s not Bee’s insults that have you in a twist, but rather her apology?
yeah sure be critical of the anon poster who’s critical of someone’s looks who is in the angry public spotlight.
but not the dozens who “cheetoh jeebus” post after post. or unkown desperate wh dinner comedians trying not to be unkown by laying it on sanders.
shine that blinding hypocrisy you crazy torch!
Drawz
June 8, 2018, 11:50pm
73
The “unknown comedian” who was a regular on The Daily Show and has her own series on Netflix?
BillBrown:
Samantha Bee is losing sponsors because of her remark about Ivanka Trump.
Bee originally issued the lamest apology I think I’ve ever heard.
“I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night,” she wrote. “It was inappropriate and inexcusable . I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it.”
If she admits it was “inexcusable”, how could she expect anyone to excuse it?
Samantha Bee Loses Advertisers After Ivanka Trump Comments
You also said it was the lamest apology you ever heard. Hence, the justifiable conclusion you were celebrating.
And it was a very classy apology. The woman knows what she is doing. Unlike Laura I.
Why don’t you rethink that one for a few minutes.
madasheck:
You also said it was the lamest apology you ever heard. Hence, the justifiable conclusion you were celebrating.
And it was a very classy apology. The woman knows what she is doing. Unlike Laura I.
She claimed I was celebrating a boycott. It was just another liberal lie.
CoachMcGuirk:
thinkingman:
ok so here’s the glaring difference. glaring to any lowly thinking man.
the bug-ugly un-funny Bee said something coarse enough to upset her sponsors who prefer not to be associated with her using a favorite liberal super offensive word .
laura was critical of a punk leftist on a political mission who in a baby fit then openly threatened her sponsors with a boycott. just because she said he “whined”. which he did. just like a little… heh, well, a little samantha bee
granted there should be no celebration of either but that’s the canyon huge difference.
please tell us you see the diffy
Are we talking about the word that Ted Nugent used about Hillary? Remember, “Toxic ■■■■■■
Yep, that is a favorite liberal super offensive word.
And silence from the left about Bee and her use of the word. Just complaining about the reaction from the right.
She hasn’t suffered a single consequence. And liberals are just cheering her on.
madasheck:
BillBrown:
Samantha Bee is losing sponsors because of her remark about Ivanka Trump.
Bee originally issued the lamest apology I think I’ve ever heard.
“I would like to sincerely apologize to Ivanka Trump and my viewers for using an expletive on my show to describe her last night,” she wrote. “It was inappropriate and inexcusable . I crossed a line, and I deeply regret it.”
If she admits it was “inexcusable”, how could she expect anyone to excuse it?
Samantha Bee Loses Advertisers After Ivanka Trump Comments
You also said it was the lamest apology you ever heard. Hence, the justifiable conclusion you were celebrating.
And it was a very classy apology. The woman knows what she is doing. Unlike Laura I.
“I was trying to reclaim the word.”
What a ■■■■■■■ weasley statement.
Drawz
June 9, 2018, 12:34am
108
thinkingman:
awe. how you defend her…
How is pointing out the simple fact that she’s not unknown defending her? You should think more.
If she had any class at all she’d have never made the statement to begin with.
idunno… how does pointing out how trump didn’t actually mock disabilities “defending my boyfriend?”
dont break your hypocrisy bone trying to answer
Drawz
June 9, 2018, 12:42am
125
That would make sense if I’d ever said you were “defending your boyfriend”, but I didn’t, so it doesn’t.
So, how is pointing out that she’s not unknown defending her, in your opinion? You said it, own it.
quite amazing, how the leftist brigade of knee-buckling hypocrisy defends Bee yet carried the raging foul mouth leftist Hogg in a golden throne because he tried to silence fox news personalities - with. a. boycott.
And the same cons that were actively defending Rush are now losing their ■■■■ about Bee.
Hypocrisy goes both ways. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Drawz
June 9, 2018, 12:50am
131
So when you said, “liberals have free reign” you meant, “liberals and conservatives have free reign”?
No you didn’t.
Show me the post you’re referring to, or admit that you’re full of ■■■■■
I did the first time, and I just provided you the posts again in the above.
You are all attempting to excuse her behavior by calling it a mistake.
It wasn’t, it doesn’t in any way remotely resemble a mistake and it is not excusible.
