Not to mention the fact that “All Lives Matter” is basically meaningless and is solely meant to detract from what “Black Lives Matter” is about. It’d be like someone saying breast cancer is bad, then some jackass saying “All cancer is bad!” Uh huh, and?
Are they? I just see them as useless noise. However, for a President who is constantly concerned with “fake news” isn’t it amazing that Fox and OANN are allowed to continue calling themselves News Networks?
I think they are. They have misled millions of people for years now. Not reporting the conservative side of the news, but propagandizing their viewers with complete fabrications and untruths, hidden beneath a veneer of journalism. It’s quite insidious.
Sure. They’ve even been nailed for it quite a few times. Business as usual. And yet, the President doesn’t include either of them in his “Fake News” rants. Well ok he includes Fox now, sometimes. When they say something negative about him. Which is still pretty rare.
I’m scared of people who can’t differentiate the things you just listed. I know they’re out there. Just sad to see it on display. Not sure what went wrong to cause it, but there it is.
“Kurt Cofano, a Pennsylvania man who allegedly threatened to blow up government buildings and was found with dozens of homemade bombs in his car last week, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on explosives and weapons charges”
TRANSLATION: They like Trump and believe in Good religion, America, Mom and Apple Pie. They have faith in the good people in the FBI who are working online to spread love and patriotism to unseat the deep state with information. Not a threat at all.
When authorities are caught out blatantly lying to the public and breaking laws and get away scott free, it is not surprising when people start to question the rest of information that they have been fed by authorities, and maybe arrive at different conclusions from orthodoxy.
Using your previous examples, I will agree there is not much difference in someone believing in Q and someone believing in the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus. Both are fictional characters propagated to convey a narrative. A difference is that I don’t know of any adults that still believe in the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus. That would be scary…maybe sad is a better descriptor than scary. Children universally grow out of the fantasy phase and are able to accept reality. Maybe the belief in Q is just an extension of that childhood fantasy. A desire for a mythical being to comfort and explain what is not understood. I think your examples are perfect in that sense.
I watched Onward last night. The left, personified in the entertainment industry, are encouraging a return to belief in magic, imagination and myth as filling a void left by technology and science.
Having a fantasy genders without any biological evidence is OK, harmless and reasonable, apparently. But believing in leftist or globalist political conspiracies while lacking conclusive proof for the same is insane and dangerous, apparently.