Deflection
Absolutely and undeniably.
There is no evidence Whitaker actually said “All Lives Matter”, or if the shooting was because of that.
The dispute didn’t start with that phrase…it started with the use of a racial slur.
And it appeared to have been settled.
So to keep repeating the meme that someone was shot for saying “All Lives Matter” is to repeat something that has no basis in fact.
Right. It started with a video uploaded to YouTube. Oh, hang on… that was Bengazi.
Is that you, Susan?
But you don’t wonder why the left has become such fertile ground for the most insane conspiracy theorists involved in politics today?
The source material for this story (in another thread on these boards), stated the following:
1- The groups first started butting heads when one group used the n-word
2- In the ensuing argument and exchange of “Black Lives Matter” and “All Lives Matter” ensued…but it was admitted that no one can confirm Whitaker was the person who said “all Lives matter”.
3- The dispute appeared to come to an end when both sides realized each was armed
4- Whitaker was shot a few minutes later, and since the murderer hasn’t been found yet, no linkage to the shooting and the utterance of the phrase “All Lives Matter” can be confirmed.
These are the facts. No one in the group Whitaker was with disputes any of these facs.
I’ll wait for the court case to determine the facts. The point is that some have argued that saying Black Lives Matter does not prove BLM affiliation. But may also argue that saying “Wherever go one we go all” proves QAnon cult-belief. I was pointing out the logical inconsistency.
Even Sessions is in on it.
“Trust Sessions" used to be a big QAnon hashtag at 8chan.
https://twitter.com/jeffsessions/status/1282744268759674881?s=21
If the eyewitnesses couldn’t confirm Whitaker said “All Lives Matter” how do you think a court will determine she did?
Get back on topic please.
There is no equivalency on the left to what QAnon is on the right.
Why do you think there is so much fertile ground on the right for a ■■■■■■■ insane conspiracy theory like Q to take root and grow so readily so as to have a dozen people run on the Republican ticket and become the party’s nominee for Congress in November?
[quote=“NebraskaFootball, post:582, topic:232702”]
That may be so. QAnon requires some intellectual curiosity where you work things out for yourself. On the left, you can’t have that. You are simply told what to think and say.
But that doesn’t account for your lack of concern about the left. You don’t wonder why the left has become such fertile ground for the most insane conspiracy theorists involved in politics today?
You don’t need to be Q follower to know that!
Q followers are mostly positive minded, polite people who get toother online and talk about good things. Not threatening. Peaceful, upbeat, strong faith kind of people. Not scary.
here they are live
Are you scared of children believing in Santa Claus? And the Easter Bunny?
Are you scared of people believing in a flat earth?
Are you scared of people believing Adam Schiff has hard evidence of 2016 Trump campaign - Russia collusion?
Or is it just ideas the politically hamper Democrats that scare you?
1 Like
Maybe suspecting what they suspect is not insane. Maybe those who dismiss what they suspect are in denial.
Couldn’t? Or wouldn’t?
Why would her fiancé want to withhold such information if he had it?
No. Believing no a satanic pedophile ring being run out of a basement of a pizza shop when such basement doesn’t exist is the very definition of insane. Don’t you agree?
1 Like
Does it now? So much intellectual curiosity so as to never ask why there has not been a single…not even one…prediction to have come true from Q. Yeah, real intellectual juggernauts.
2 Likes
No. It’s insane. There is not a cabal of cannibals who are drinking the blood of children and secretly running the world. It’s not denial. It’s insanity.
1 Like
Hey I watched all of these YouTube videos and you wouldn’t believe what I worked out for myself.
1 Like
