Your fishing “license” doesn’t mean anything in a different state. Usually.
Nope. But a driver’s license does. Which is the point
WuWei:Full faith and credit
shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.
Medical licenses, law licenses, LTC
Concealed Carry…….
I would think IF the article they are claiming applies to marriage licenses DOES apply to marriage licenses, then it would also apply to the ones you listed and concealed carry licenses as well.
Wonder why it doesn’t…… or maybe article IV doesn’t work the way they claim it does.
Fine by me. I am cool with gay folks getting married and you carrying your gun wherever you want.
Concealed Carry…….
If someone’s gay marriage from Californica counts as being actual-married here in Missouri, my Unalienable Right to carry concealed should be just as valid in California as it is here.
Steel-W0LF:Concealed Carry…….
If someone’s gay marriage from Californica counts as being actual-married here in Missouri, my Unalienable Right to carry concealed should be just as valid in California as it is here.
Excellent point!
Heck…gay folks carrying guns!
SixFoot: Steel-W0LF:Concealed Carry…….
If someone’s gay marriage from Californica counts as being actual-married here in Missouri, my Unalienable Right to carry concealed should be just as valid in California as it is here.
Excellent point!
More specifically, I do not require a concealed carry license/permit to carry concealed, because it is my Unalienable Right, and coded so in my State’s Constitution.
My Unalienable Rights somehow end at another State’s border, but their alternative-marriage goes wherever they prance? That’s pretty messed up.
gooddad409: SixFoot: Steel-W0LF:Concealed Carry…….
If someone’s gay marriage from Californica counts as being actual-married here in Missouri, my Unalienable Right to carry concealed should be just as valid in California as it is here.
Excellent point!
More specifically, I do not require a concealed carry license/permit to carry concealed, because it is my Unalienable Right, and coded so in my State’s Constitution.
My Unalienable Rights somehow end at another State’s border, but their alternative-marriage goes wherever they prance? That’s pretty messed up.
Well their rights are just (D)ifferent you know!
I don’t recognize SSM as real marriage myself. I just totally ignore it/them.
It’s definitely a sham disguised as a real marriage. Nothing more than a tax break for the chronically envious. But hey, they’re the idiots that have to deal with divorce now, so lol at their dumbasses when they start finding out that marriage isn’t why they’ll never have a healthy relationship.
The only part I have a problem with is when the “queer plight” starts being given more priority than actual rights that apply to the entire gen pop.
My right to be able to defend myself is far more important than some stupid piece of paper that records nothing more than a voluntary choice.
There ya go.
thinkingman:no they’re just against the “marriage” part
Yes and you’ve lost. Progress continues without you.
oh did this become about me? lol
yeah “progress”. making everything be anything to everybody.
good job lefties.
thinkingman: Orygun: thinkingman:oh good then people against gay “marriage” aren’t against love
…people against gay “marriage” are against certain types of love
no they’re just against the “marriage” part
they dont otherwise give a damn about who loves who
What difference does it make to anyone if same sex couples get married?
what difference does it make if they can’t?
what happened to civil unions?
living together not cool enough anymore?
Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
no one’s denying anyone the ability to make commitments.
Nemesis:Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
no one’s denying anyone the ability to make commitments.
But not just marriage is that it?
thinkingman: Nemesis:Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
no one’s denying anyone the ability to make commitments.
But not just marriage is that it?
right marriage is for.opposite genders for good reasons
sorry about that
they can still be happy together though. no one cares what they do.
Nemesis: thinkingman: Nemesis:Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
no one’s denying anyone the ability to make commitments.
But not just marriage is that it?
right marriage is for.opposite genders for good reasons
sorry about that
they can still be happy together though. no one cares what they do.
Well thank god that opinion is now in the minority. You obviously care if they get married.
thinkingman: Nemesis: thinkingman: Nemesis:Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
no one’s denying anyone the ability to make commitments.
But not just marriage is that it?
right marriage is for.opposite genders for good reasons
sorry about that
they can still be happy together though. no one cares what they do.
Well thank god that opinion is now in the minority. You obviously care if they get married.
if gov’t approves it’s gotta be right huh?
Its not about being cool. Same sex couples want to be able to commit to each other just like anyone else.
Why should they be denied that?
A cogent point to be used in favor of adopting a constitutional amendment to accommodate “same sex couples”.