A authentic liberal, like me.
Unfortunately, one is real, the other not.
The full faith and credit clause is not being applied evenly.
2 Likes
We donāt care if they get married we are just gonna write about how much we donāt careā¦. And how everything those other people do should be in private ā¦.
2 Likes
Donāt make marriage in your state a public actā¦and then you can stipulate that.
In most states, marriage is a public act soā¦Full Faith and Credit applies.
Perfectly constitutional.
2 Likes
What āgood reasonsā?
Them getting married and enjoying the benefits (taxes and legal) that come with that in no way, shape or form impacts anyone elseās marriageā¦even if one thinks LGBTQ is wrong.
Doubtful. When the Defense of Marriage Act was actually being voted on only 1 state voted against it.
In TN 80 percent voted for it.
Actual voting means more than any number of left wing āpollsā saying otherwise.
We donāt care what they doā¦but they canāt call what they do āmarriageā because reasons.
1 Like
Those are extra rights!
1 Like
DOMA was passed 26 years ago.
You seriously think the sentiment for it is the same now as it was then?
Itās what some have to cling.
WW
Where does the Constitution accommodate opposite sex couples?
1 Like
The Full Faith and Credit Clause always applies where applicable. But it does not require one state to enforce a law or policies [sexual deviant marriages] of another state.
JWK
Youāre wrong. Again.
Our federal constitution is silent on the subject. In fact, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the States and people therein all authority not delegated to the United States.
The subject you mention is in fact one of the powers retained by the states and people therein under federalism, which is summarized as follows:
āThe powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State." ___ Federalist 45
public acts 
records,
and judicial proceedings
LTC next!
Lieutenant Colonel? Long Term Care?
License To Carry
Or even better Constitutional carry.
According to you but not the constitutional meaning of the Full Faith and Credit clause.
As Supreme Court Justice Stanley Reed concluded in Griffin v. McCoach (1941), āA state is not required to enforce a law obnoxious to its policy.ā
That is not law. Itās an opinion. Mine is not opinion.
Youāre wrong. Again.
According to you!
Wrong about what?
Again- thats a law. Other states donāt have to enforce laws made by other states (see Cannabis). So- not Article 4.
But you have an argument that the 2nd should be applied equally in all 50 states.
