As CEO,she wasn’t responsible for its content?
Good lord.
If Ford produces a car with 1 window and a 2 stroke engine that runs on battery acid, the CEO isn’t responsible for that car being manufactured and put on market?
She was no more responsible for the content than Premiere is responsible for the content here.
Okay, you go with that.
Anything to excuse her from what she wrote before.
I’m happy to go with the facts, your BS aside.
When you finally post some facts in this thread, let me know.
That you can’t recognize facts or won’t admit it when you see them speaks volumes.
What facts have you posted?
So far you’ve posted your opinion on Owens.
And you’ve posted your opinion on that CEOs aren’t responsible for the content of their company.
All I see is opinion.
Facts which you deny or can’t recognize for what they are.
You have ZERO idea that she was not responsible for the content of the blog. ZERO, unless you were sitting in her office with her when opinions were being written and posted on the blog.
I know it for a fact, she didn’t publish it and did not have control of it, she just provided hosting for it and an occasional post for which she was responsible.
The CEO of Premier has the same responsibility for the content here.
You need to edit quickly, you cannot use the B word in that manner here.
Ah ha. Another Republican grifter. That explains her popularity.
2 Likes
