Reproduction and The State - Objectively As Policy

Well, they probably aren’t allergic to peanuts and wheat, so yeah.

1 Like

It creates hardier more self reliant people.

Also tend to create great men. Men like Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower grew up on family farms.

Wait people are actually allergic to wheat?

The state will become the new God.

Gluten

I thought that was a diet myth thing.

Celiac disease.

Well, apparently we’re doing just the opposite now. In Flint, Michigan and Baltimore, Maryland- two of the biggest holes in the country.

Why would we encourage and subsidize reproduction in either of these failed areas?

1 Like

Because the people who don’t think with their genitals are high-tailing it to the Midwest. :rofl:

2 Likes

This seems like yet another example of wasting resources for little to no return to me.

Similar to This about “Palestinians”

If there is resource competition (and there always is), doesn’t it make more sense to use them where the perfected state is promoting the “good” (for it) societies?

Hegel was wrong. - Revelations

Left? Me, never. Not a Left wing bone in my body. I don’t even appear in their self-serving political spectrum.

But if someone is gonna posit (Hegel, not you) the primacy of the state I will post the truth.

Get with the program.

“Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity.”

Gramsci

The Devil is in the details, literally, in how that works out for the world.

1 Like

The more I think about this, the more I’m convinced that certain segments of society should be encouraged to abort.

And you’ve have seen this attitude expressed…where?

???

Which attitude?

You’re regurgitating Popper’s Hegel. Crap.