There comes a point where plausible deniability starts to dissipate, I think we’re past that now.
This is going to be a real headache for Democrats. I believe some in the Democratic party are already getting worried about the drift away from a previously more pro-Israel party position as well.
Ya no surprises here, the other Jihadist congress woman (Omar) had kind words to say about Hamas while at the same time condemning Israel, so naturally the democrats elected her.
King was more explicit, and he’s already been stripped of basically all his power at this point to be fair.
Democrats discussed censuring him, but decided against it due to the precedent it would set re: comments made when not on the floor.
Would be nice to see him gone though.
Tlaib hasn’t been as explicit yet, nor has she done it as many times as King has.
imo she’s associated with anti-semites for so long and likely absorbed some of the rhetoric/propaganda that it will leak out again eventually. A common problem with pro-Palestinian activists.
I am wary of using these type of tenuous associations as evidence, a Facebook group and random video someone linked one day… I just don’t know.
I guess vetting fundraisers might be a thing, at least at some level of politics… but patrolling every post and vetting the history of all members of Facebook groups you join… hmmm…
It’s more than just being in the same FB group, though. She explicitly thanked them—multiple times. It doesn’t seem like a case of very loose associations, but rather deeper than that.
If you were the PM of Israel how would you handle the situation with Hamas? They have said on numerous occasions their aim is too remove all Jews from Israel. Or on the West Bank side with the so-called ‘moderate’ Abbas who famously said he didn’t want any “Filthy Jewish Feet” desecrating the holy sites.