“stop promoting climate denial and climate disinfo vids by removing them immediately…”
please read her letter
stick to topic please
I did read the letter. You cut it short for some reason.
“stop promoting climate denial and climate disinfo vids by removing them immediately from the platforms reccomendation algorithm”
False narrative 
.
3 Likes
Why did you stop there?
Maybe it changes the meaning a just a little bit?
1 Like
No one has the right to someone else’s private platform. Google is able to do as they wish.
A Congressperson can write a letter requesting that they form their algorithm in a way that does not intentionally spread misinformation for money. Google can do with that as they wish
1 Like
why read on beyond having videos removed?
the method is immaterial
Are they social media sites that portray neutrality to the unsuspecting user? Your comparison of these entities escapes logic IMO?
The video isn’t removed, the recommendation is. As in it won’t appear in “watch next” or “you might like this”, not that it’s removed from the platform.
1 Like
The videos are not being removed.
whitewash defense
from a position of power in govmnt she should not be pressuring anyone to remove or control info she doesnt agree with
she asked that they be removed.
“urged” ackshually
The ifnormation isn’t removed. It’s just not actively promoted in “you might like this”, and advertisers won’t pay to run their ads on that content.
It is a letter.
Google can do with it as they wish.
You misread. It’s fine, we all make mistakes.
2 Likes
No… no she didn’t.
she urged that videos be removed.
you gonna keep pretending the letter doesnt say what it says?
You don’t understand the letter, plainly. Or you’re just being dishonest.
What is the youtube recommendation algorithm?
1 Like
blithe denial of reality
Heaping on the irony aren’t you.
No… she didn’t
