Remember when global warming was the biggest threat?

[Oryx]

@SixFoot

I can’t even remember how long it’s been since I watched one, or exactly how old I was when it first aired. Both were a long time ago at this point. lol

I haven’t watched it in a long time either, but I think it’s been on the air for something like thirty years.

[WuWei]

@Oryx

@WuWei

Not “a” habitat, their own habitat. Make it, but make it in China. NIMBY.

I agree that attitude is a problem, but we can’t attribute it to all environmentalists. Many agree with you about China and would love to decouple from them.

No they wouldn’t.

[Oryx]

@WuWei

No they wouldn’t.

Some would, some wouldn’t. Your broad brush is inaccurate.

[WuWei]

@Oryx

@WuWei

No they wouldn’t.

Some would, some wouldn’t. Your broad brush is inaccurate.

Some will say they do, until they think about the impact on them.

[Auto129]

I see consequences playing out rather than purposeful Immiseration. It’s silly that people were willing to live with so much exposure to commidity-based energy costs.

[WuWei]

'Just Common Sense': UK Confirms it Will Lift Fracking Ban in England

[WuWei]

@Auto129

I see consequences playing out rather than purposeful Immiseration. It’s silly that people were willing to live with so much exposure to commidity-based energy costs.

What? It’s purposeful immiseration for fabricated consequences.

What energy source do you feel will not be “commodity based”?

[Auto129]

Noting that the UK would continue to be reliant on gas for some years to come, Rees-Mogg told representatives that it was better to source the hydrocarbon locally than be left to the mercy of foreign malign actors like Russia and the Gulf states for hydrocarbons, or even China which makes the vast majority of the world’s solar panels.

This will be great to qoute next time they get bent over by foreigners. Hydrocarbon producers will chase overseas money and leave the British exposed to high prices.

[Oryx]

@WuWei

Some will say they do, until they think about the impact on them.

I would pay more for anything currently made in China if it meant we could decouple from them, but I have the money to do so. Not so easy for everyone, especially these days. But any “environmentalist” with money who wouldn’t do the same is a fraud.

[Auto129]

It’s not purposeful at all. Nobody told Putin to act up. Power companies to exposed themselves to gas prices due to their own short term thinking.

[WuWei]

Stop screaming at them.

[WuWei]

@Oryx

@WuWei

Some will say they do, until they think about the impact on them.

I would pay more for anything currently made in China if it meant we could decouple from them, but I have the money to do so. Not so easy for everyone, especially these days. But any “environmentalist” with money who wouldn’t do the same is a fraud.

No, it’s not easy. Yes, it has to be done.

“They” should have thought about it before they coupled.

[WuWei]

@Auto129

It’s not purposeful at all. Nobody told Putin to act up. Power companies to exposed themselves to gas prices due to their own short term thinking.

Of course it is. You© have decided we’re killing the planet.

[Auto129]

@WuWei

Of course it is. You© have decided we’re killing the planet.

And the so-called immiseration that followed was simply asking hydrocarbon industries to clean up after themselves.

Ash ponds should be secured, wells properly capped, carcinogens minimalized, engine soot disposed of, ground water protected. Leave things the way you found them.

The green agenda is everything these companies should have already been doing just to be good neighbors.

[JayJay]

These aren’t examples of what I was talking about.

The beneficiaries of these acts would be themselves…not others and not far in the future.

[Oryx]

@WuWei

“They” should have thought about it before they coupled.

Sure, but that doesn’t help us solve the problem now.

[conan]

@WuWei

Critprogs never consider the consequences of their virtue tantrums.

Precisely, they don’t consider unintended consequences of the fee fees/emotions.

[conan]

@Striker840

That’s rich coming from someone who cuts like a surgeon. Lmao

Notice how those libs always push their hardcore radicalism and then when it blows up in their faces they spread the blame to lib-con thing. And then later they rewrite history as it being republican fault. Incremental lying until they’re resolved from all and any blame.

[conan]

@Oryx

But any “environmentalist” with money who wouldn’t do the same is a fraud.

I know many of em…many of em. They don’t practice what they preach.

[Optrader]

@JayJay

Nobody does.

The system is set up so we don’t have to see it, and so therefore don’t have to think about it.

Generate and consume a ■■■■■■■■ of energy here to create order…expel the entropy elsewhere in areas and on groups far away.

It’s not a Lib/Con thing…it’s a human thing.

Libs talk about the environment but ignore the slave labor and pollution in China.

Cons call Libs stupid and hypocritical, but the desire to keep illegals out is to make sure the entropy doesn’t creep back into our home here.

Same desires…different ways of expressing it.

Dissipative structure.

You whine about slave labor in other countries but have no problem stealing the fruit of working, tax paying Americans labor and redistributing it to able bodied dead beats and illegals who contribute nothing to the system. Pray tell dude, what’s the difference?