DougBH
63
You have yet to say what this discussion proved except that Parnass met with Trump and taped the conversation. Your mind is streaming into a million possibilities with no evidence.
Hypocrisy is a fickle mistress? You pick that up from some paperback mystery or something?
My guess is you were defending Obama for having meetings with terrorists and mobsters, if you want to talk hypocrisy.
Shame on all the posters here that keep spreading and repeating this persons name.
Thereâs a reason why whistleblower protections exist.
That doesnât prove anything!
DougBH
66
More idles speculation. Remember, investigating this would be seeking assistance from a foreign country to help the Democrats get elected and asking a foreign government to interfere in our election, so I guess thatâs the end of it.
DougBH
67
Saying âitâ. Saying what? Lol is right.
tnt
68
No, itâs not speculation. Itâs fact backed up by text messages and recordings. There is no speculation at all about it.
The mobsters were surveilling a US ambassador.
Trump is on record saying she would âgo through some thingsâ.
These are facts.
STODR
69
lol the new line of attack. âTaking advice from mobstersâ
DougBH
70
These are two separate things that you have put in the same paragraph to make it seem like there is some connection between them.
Glenn Beck would be jealous of the conspiracy detailing.
Ironic post after Republican President gives hours-long lie-filled speech on national tv.
Jezcoe
72

DougBH:
You have yet to say what this discussion proved except that Parnass met with Trump and taped the conversation. Your mind is streaming into a million possibilities with no evidence.
Hypocrisy is a fickle mistress? You pick that up from some paperback mystery or something?
My guess is you were defending Obama for having meetings with terrorists and mobsters, if you want to talk hypocrisy.
Actual recordings and then later actions isnât " a million possibilities"
Unless we are looping back to the President did nothing wrong.
DougBH
73
Again, no specifics of the recording leading up to anything. Two separate things that have nothing to do with each other. And the two things are pretty vague at that.
And we all come back to the real fact: Trump could have picked up the phone at any time and removed that ambassador and it makes not sense to imagine some fantastic plot that he would be involved in to do what he had the authority to do anyway.
At least dream up conspiracies that make sense.
2 Likes
sikofit
74
Yeah why believe Trumpâs actual recorded words?
Plotting to over throw a duly elected President is called a coup, it is illegal just so you know.
Camp
76
The crooked Parnas hidden MIC moment?
Go ahead post it up.
Nothing else going on.
Trumpophobes canât even get ahead of him with surreptitious recordings.

DougBH
77
Which specific words are those?
So you admit that it did happen and itâs not fiction.
Camp
79
You on the forever election of Maduro train.

SixFoot
80
So whatâs the whitleblowerâs name?
He didnât mention the Mueller hoax.
DougBH
82
What is âitâ?
A recorded conversation in April 2018? Yes âitâ happened.