I haven’t seen any exclusions, have you?
It wasn’t just Washington, an estimated 57 million watched it on tv and there were mini marches in a lot of places. There was one in a small town not far from me.
I haven’t seen any exclusions, have you?
It wasn’t just Washington, an estimated 57 million watched it on tv and there were mini marches in a lot of places. There was one in a small town not far from me.
So they’re doing it wrong?
What is needed to be a “decent” human being?
I made my point…not going to get into a string of "why’ questions…lol. No offense
(And on top of that, I’m not good at putting my thoughts to type/explaining myself. Thats why I ‘like’ others posts more than I post myself. They say it much better than I can…lol)
I don’t think you have.
Hence the statement at the bottom of my response
Where did you get your morality, your sense of what constitutes a “decent” human being?
You make my case.
Thank you.
How so? I’ve always thought if you believe in a God you don’t have to go to a church or events such as these to profess your faith.
Nobody said anyone has to do anything.
Of course, it’s just delicious to see a professed atheist/agnostic pretending to lecture anyone on what someone of faith should (or should not) be doing.
Because the example I gave of how the “religious” act never made sense to me…even as a child.
That’s because it’s just your projection.
Sure, you can find SOME people of any organization or creed or philosophy who act counter to what they profess. (Pelosi and Biden Catholics are two great examples.) But to apply that to “the religious” is simply dishonest, and nothing short of your own fabrication.
I like how you cut off my post in your quote…You should get a job in the CEC
I like how you cut off my post in your quote…
That’s because what I cut off was just your projection.
Which makes my point!
Thanks!
You do know we are all sinners right? Even Christians. Do you even know why Jesus died on the cross?
Looks like a pretty good crowd.
Like the majority of Americans. So, so very few steal the headlines and are used by partisans to condemn the other side. Nice to see this.
A Sunday Christian or Sunday morning Christian (also once-a-weeker) is a term of denunciation used to refer to someone who typically attends Christian church services on Sundays, but is presumed or witnessed not to adhere to the doctrines or rules of the religion (either actively or passively), or refuses to register as a church member. These members are sometimes considered to be hypocritical in how or what they practice due in part to their confusion or cherry-picking how they live their rel
This is what I mean…
Scratch:Because the example I gave of how the “religious” act never made sense to me…even as a child.
That’s because it’s just your projection.
Sure, you can find SOME people of any organization or creed or philosophy who act counter to what they profess. (Pelosi and Biden Catholics are two great examples.) But to apply that to “the religious” is simply dishonest, and nothing short of your own fabrication.
Pelosi and Biden are indeed two examples. Very counter indeed.
And??..lol. Frankly I’m not too fond of anyone who feels they need to profess they are a Christian or a Catholic etc…
Looks more like a ■■■■■■■■ march to me. Why would anyone want to live under theocracy?
Who wants to live under BLM mob justice? See how ridiculous that sounds?
And yet, you apparently have need to define them.
Yep because the majority of those that feel the need to profess “Im a Christian” are the biggest hypocrites and act the most unchristian like…imo.