These people are enablers of a New York City mafia dude.
They don’t have the strength to stand up to Trump either.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
1 Like
This, right here.
This is why I said the other day that Trump’s cons work for a couple years and then people like bankers figure him out. While people with strength and courage and integrity, like General Mattis, figured him out quickly. The weak males in the room just roll over and let Trump walk on them. A female porn star had more courage and strength than the weak males under Trump currently.
Trump voters don’t have it in them to stand up to Trump either. They’re just not strong enough.
Even with a smoking gun…5th Ave Syndrome is real.
You don’t need teh FBI to charge Hillary with a crime. What are they waiting for?
Hillary hasn’t been indicted…neither has Former President Obama, Obamacare is still around with no replacement, Mexico hasn’t paid for the Wall, donnie’s investigators haven’t returned from Hawaii, the FISA investigation hasn’t been declassified, donnie’s tax returns haven’t been released, and the border hasn’t been closed.
What a man!!!
6 Likes
- tech·ni·cal·ly
ADVERB
- according to the facts or exact meaning of something.
And using Comey as an example of strength and character is really astounding especially what he did to Hillary and whose only strength is lawlessness!
So you’re vote is for anarchy, right?
Could Comey be getting a little nervous over maybe this:
2 Likes
It will probably take a bunch of military men to eventually stand up and Trump and say what you’re doing is not American.
The Republicans in DC, especially the men, just don’t have the guts.
So are you saying the two are equivalent… and since you believe collusion to be a delusion all the focus on Clinton’s emails was equally nonsensical?
Or are you saying that just as Clinton compromised US security with her server, Trump sold the country out in his dealings with Russia.
Which answer do you prefer?
At the very beginning Mueller states that, being a vague term with no legal meaning, he is not going to even be looking at collusion. So no, it did not confirm collusion…whatever that is.
2 Likes
Kind of odd that a special prosecutor was appointed to look into something that there is no legal term for don’t ya think 
Goes to show it was for show only and to damage a Sitting president. So Mueller went with Federal Law and found nothing he could charge him with.
And it’s funny how he could investigate and charge ANY crimes found in the investigation. Why wasn’t hillary charged for “Legal fees” to a law firm that went to a foriegn agent? (Steele).
Hillary campaign colluded with the Russians as well through Steele. Your thoughts on that?
Why not? I mean if someone who’s just running for President can do it…
So he wasn’t looking for collusion. Just looking into the Russian interference, and to see if the president could be charged with any crime under the federal criminal code.
Guess what, Mueller couldn’t find any vilation of the law.
That’s correct, but I keep wondering why trump supporters keep bringing the “no collusion” defense at every turn when it wasn’t even mentioned in the appointment letter. Do you ever wonder why?
Because that’s what the libs are always yelling.
Now why wasn’t Hillary Charged for labeling funds distributed from her campaign as “legal fees”, when it went ot pay steele for information from Russians?
If he read the report he wouldnt have to do this…
Snow has been told this…its now a routine with him.
2 Likes
