Gerrymandering is done for political party power. When Democrats dominated Texas, they gerrymandered for their own interests. Republicans inherited the process when they took power. The goal is party power. As long as different races tend to vote predominantly for certain parties, there must always be a secondary racial aspect to gerrymandering. The politicians are thinking party political power though.
a result of republicans buckling under to so called “independent commissions” which are far from independent. Insider establishment political operatives do not make up an “independent commission”
In New York, the redistricting cycle began, perhaps naïvely, in the hopes that a bipartisan outside commission — approved by voters in 2014 — would deliver a balanced, common-sense map.
Instead, the commission stuck to party lines and was unable to reach consensus last month, kicking control of the process back to the State Legislature, where Democrats have amassed rare supermajorities in recent years. Those majorities, plus control of the governorship, gave them the power for the first time in decades to draw maps as they saw fit.
the entire argument against gerrymandering is silly. every single seat is gerrymandered. i.e. drawn to get some result. some are drawn to get an r, some to get a d, some to be more competitive. either way, they are drawn to achieve something. the majority party not taking advantage of its majority status would be stupid on their part. they represent a constituency that expects them to advance their collective agenda.
lawsuits against political gerrymandering are frivolous tripe