One and only Kavenaugh Hearings Thread (part 1)

[Krandor]

@DougBH

Great…like that witness that said it DID happen and that there were rumors about it…until people started asking for interviews and it turned out to be rumors about Kavanaughs school, not Kavanaugh and she recanted.
Now what is some other activist from the school says she specifially knew all about it, even saw her come out of the window.
No, its to late to even talk to people from back then. They can say anything and some will.

Exactly. She wants this change on national TV to bring up something she hasn’t mentioned before that will seem scandalous with no way for the committee to check afterwards.

You HAVE to give Kav a chance to respond to whatever she now suddenly remembers that she didn’t before. Anything else is totally unfair.

[Krandor]

@Jezcoe

It would seem that a proper investigation would probably show that

I am saying that honestly.

There is clearly something she is going to say at the committee she hasn’t said before. There is no way to get her to tell that before she wants to regardless of investigation.

[rp5x5]

@Jezcoe

@rp5x5

The only thing to “investigate” is the perjury, sedition and treason of the leftist blooddrinkers.

Then stake them, like Buffy would do.

They could do that too.

I would have no problem with it.

I don’t know how one would prove the drinking of blood… but maybe they could find out.

Adrenocrome
(more than 10 characters)

[DMK]

@Girl_from_Ipanema

I am aghast at how rabid “people” are to ruin a man’s reputation on 0 evidence.

Sickening.

Thank you for chiming in I really do value your input.

From all appearances you have what seems to be a complete “flake” that can take down a lifetime of work and good deeds.

Do people not realize that anyone who makes an accusation of this magnitude should be scrutinized and held accountable?

[Jezcoe]

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

It would seem that a proper investigation would probably show that

I am saying that honestly.

There is clearly something she is going to say at the committee she hasn’t said before. There is no way to get her to tell that before she wants to regardless of investigation.

If there was an investigation and she witheld information then I would be on your side of credulity if she brought it up in front of congress for shock effect.

[Jezcoe]

@rp5x5

@Jezcoe

@rp5x5

The only thing to “investigate” is the perjury, sedition and treason of the leftist blooddrinkers.

Then stake them, like Buffy would do.

They could do that too.

I would have no problem with it.

I don’t know how one would prove the drinking of blood… but maybe they could find out.

Adrenocrome
(more than 10 characters)

You do realize that not everything that you see on the internet is true… right?

[Krandor]

@Jezcoe

If there was an investigation and she witheld information then I would be on your side of credulity if she brought it up in front of congress for shock effect.

The problem there is you would have to know what question to ask. Whatever information she has could be something that might not be an obvious question. Yes if she lied she would be in trouble but if an investigator didn’t ask that would be different.

[DougBH]

It would not show that, if she had stood her ground.

[DMK]

@Jezcoe

@rp5x5

Why would they scrub the Yearbook off the internet and her social media?

Read the yearbook stuff.

Go watch Hannity now, the interview and the rally.

#walkaway

I don’t know if it scrubbed or not. I guess I can take the word of someone who said it was scrubbed.

There is certainly stuff in there that is embarrassing for the way high schoolers should act.

As far as drinking… in 1982 being a Senior in High School one would have been legal to drink, so even though it may seem surprising… it was certainly happening a lot more in the open than it is now or even when I was in high school in the late 80’s early 90’s

So I ask again… if you think that she is making it up… why is the yearbook important?

I will answer the same. as I did before…Why are BK’s legal opinions important if he is to be a SC Justice?

[Jezcoe]

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

If there was an investigation and she witheld information then I would be on your side of credulity if she brought it up in front of congress for shock effect.

The problem there is you would have to know what question to ask. Whatever information she has could be something that might not be an obvious question. Yes if she lied she would be in trouble but if an investigator didn’t ask that would be different.

“Have you told us everything?”

That should cover it.

[Cynic]

Best to not engage him.

[Jezcoe]

@DMK

@Jezcoe

@rp5x5

Why would they scrub the Yearbook off the internet and her social media?

Read the yearbook stuff.

Go watch Hannity now, the interview and the rally.

#walkaway

I don’t know if it scrubbed or not. I guess I can take the word of someone who said it was scrubbed.

There is certainly stuff in there that is embarrassing for the way high schoolers should act.

As far as drinking… in 1982 being a Senior in High School one would have been legal to drink, so even though it may seem surprising… it was certainly happening a lot more in the open than it is now or even when I was in high school in the late 80’s early 90’s

So I ask again… if you think that she is making it up… why is the yearbook important?

I will answer the same. as I did before…Why are BK’s legal opinions important if he is to be a SC Justice?

His legal opinions are important.

I fail to see what that has to do with her yearbook.

[Jezcoe]

@Cynic

Best to not engage him.

Sometimes it’s fun.

Then I #walkaway

[DMK]

@Jezcoe

@DougBH

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

If there was a proper investigation then there wouldn’t be a “gotcha” moment in front of congress.

An investigation into stuff 36 years ago will simply be asking witnesses that are available. she can still withhold information into the “most appropriate” time.

Great…like that witness that said it DID happen and that there were rumors about it…until people started asking for interviews and it turned out to be rumors about Kavanaughs school, not Kavanaugh and she recanted.
Now what if some other activist from the school says she specifially knew all about it, even saw her come out of the window.
No, its to late to even talk to people from back then. They can say anything and some will.

It would seem that a proper investigation would probably show that

I am saying that honestly.

I keep asking you… Investigation of what?

[Krandor]

@Jezcoe

“Have you told us everything?”

That should cover it.

A complete open ended question like that would never get somebody in trouble.

[Jezcoe]

@DMK

@Jezcoe

@DougBH

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

If there was a proper investigation then there wouldn’t be a “gotcha” moment in front of congress.

An investigation into stuff 36 years ago will simply be asking witnesses that are available. she can still withhold information into the “most appropriate” time.

Great…like that witness that said it DID happen and that there were rumors about it…until people started asking for interviews and it turned out to be rumors about Kavanaughs school, not Kavanaugh and she recanted.
Now what if some other activist from the school says she specifially knew all about it, even saw her come out of the window.
No, its to late to even talk to people from back then. They can say anything and some will.

It would seem that a proper investigation would probably show that

I am saying that honestly.

I keep asking you… Investigation of what?

Well… if there is this idea that she has a piece of evidence that she wants to spring on congress… my guess that would be something.

[Krandor]

@Jezcoe

Well… if there is this idea that she has a piece of evidence that she wants to spring on congress… my guess that would be something.

The question is how would an investigation find it since we are still talking about a 36 year old investigation?

If she has something just spill it so things can move on… but this isn’t about the truth but about delaying the confirmation until the new senate.

[DMK]

@Jezcoe

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

It would seem that a proper investigation would probably show that

I am saying that honestly.

There is clearly something she is going to say at the committee she hasn’t said before. There is no way to get her to tell that before she wants to regardless of investigation.

If there was an investigation and she witheld information then I would be on your side of credulity if she brought it up in front of congress for shock effect.

Should there really be a "side" on this matter?

Think about it… A person with a claim that cannot be substantiated, almost 40 years later can derail previous numerous vettings?

[Jezcoe]

@Krandor

@Jezcoe

Well… if there is this idea that she has a piece of evidence that she wants to spring on congress… my guess that would be something.

The question is how would an investigation find it since we are still talking about a 36 year old investigation?

If she has something just spill it so things can move on… but this isn’t about the truth but about delaying the confirmation until the new senate.

Exactly. If she has something to spill. Wouldn’t it be better to be to the FBI than infront of Congress?

[Girl_from_Ipanema]

@DMK

@Girl_from_Ipanema

I am aghast at how rabid “people” are to ruin a man’s reputation on 0 evidence.

Sickening.

Thank you for chiming in I really do value your input.

From all appearances you have what seems to be a complete “flake” that can take down a lifetime of work and good deeds.

Do people not realize that anyone who makes an accusation of this magnitude should be scrutinized and held accountable?

That’s what really boggles my mind. I’m sure that those who are using this to virtue signal their “support” for women believe that they’ve never done anything that could ever result in such a charge being directed their way. I hope for their sake that this precedent isn’t set, even if they don’t have enough sense to hope it for themselves.

It’s been even weirder watching them tell people with such authority how a woman who has been raped must feel about this unfair treatment of Ford as if we’re all one unit. Misogyny at it’s finest.