OK...what the hell have libs been doing all these years?

[Bomberfox]

Nobody said anything about voting for him because he is black.

[Bomberfox]

Reality is a hell of a thing. Nobody is an island and everyone relies on someone for something.

[Bomberfox]

Please tell us the specific policies that have managed that.

[Bomberfox]

Do you aree with trump or not?

[conan]

Why solve problems when they can use those issues to campaign on.

[Roxiebelle]

@conan

Sorry but same old same old talkpoints gets old and don’t deserve and answer.

The age old question “how do you talk to a lib”, the answer is you don’t because it’s a total waste of time. They haven’t changed their rhetoric in over 5 decades, it’s the same miserable & monotonous victim hood and guilt claptrap, it never ends.

[Optrader]

@Bomberfox

Nobody said anything about voting for him because he is black.

First, I was commenting on the statement that “By the fact that it’s not true, and we are so racist that we elected a black POTUS twice.” This comment was made to refute claims of racism. If you have to point out someone’s race to make a point, that’s racism.

Second, by the same line of reasoning, we didn’t NOT vote for Obama because he was black.

See, racism works both ways.

[Bomberfox]

Lol! Sorry i dont deal in nonsensical juvenile pablum. It was about one claim, you made it about you.

[mobulis]

@Optrader

@Bomberfox

Nobody said anything about voting for him because he is black.

First, I was commenting on the statement that “By the fact that it’s not true, and we are so racist that we elected a black POTUS twice.” This comment was made to refute claims of racism. If you have to point out someone’s race to make a point, that’s racism.

Second, by the same line of reasoning, we didn’t NOT vote for Obama because he was black.

See, racism works both ways.

No its not, and no it isn’t.

[mobulis]

@peek-a-boo

Actually it is very true. DEMs really don’t believe minorities can do anything without direct DEM support. They are very up front about that.

Nope, sorry.

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

DEMs don’t actually do anything beyond talking and making people feel like they really care. Sounds like you equate those empty platitudes to actually doing something.

Hey, what can I say!

Even if that were true… are you saying that talking about policies that specifically target minorities is a bad thing?

What is keeping republicans from doing the same? They do it for the evangelicals and farmers.

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

It is a meaningless piece of legislation. Those voting against it were simply pointing that out.

Meaningless?!

Again… only a Republican talking point would call anti lynching legislation… “meaningless.”

[peek-a-boo]

What exactly does the legislation provide that current laws don’t already provide?

[peek-a-boo]

Talking accomplishes nothing without follow up action.

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

What exactly does the legislation provide that current laws don’t already provide?

Likely nothing…

But you are missing the point of the legislation.

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

Talking accomplishes nothing without follow up action.

But Republicans aren’t even interested in taking step one, which is talking about policies that specifically benefit minorities.

[peek-a-boo]

While DEMs continue to push that false narrative, the Trump administration is making a difference in those communities. Of course one would never know that because the MSM would never report anything remotely favorable to Trump.

[peek-a-boo]

There is no point beyond feeling good about one’s self.

[PurpnGold]

@peek-a-boo

There is no point beyond feeling good about one’s self.

There are people still alive today who witnessed Lynchings. They probably do not share your disregard.

[peek-a-boo]

Do you disagree that the legislation has no real purpose beyond feeling good?