relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief.
It doesn’t matter who the woman was or who sent her.
If it was a prank, AOC fell for it.
The fact remains that AOC, when told that climate change demanded eating babies, did not contradict it.
The excuses for her, I’ve seen, here are lame. ‘she didn’t want to dignify it’…‘she didn’t want to be misquoted’…‘her body language spoke for her’…‘she didn’t want to mock a mentally ill person’…BALONEY!!
She’s fine with cannibalism if that is what the lunatics that put her in office want.
I still say it.
Lyndon Larouche was an avowed Trotskyite and Democrat candidate for president.
He was not a far-rightwinger. To claim the Larouchites are right-wingers is a lie.
The fact that AOC bought into cannibalism and the town hall full of her fans didn’t boo it down, proves the idiocy I spoke of.