Ny ag moves to dissolve the nra

[moonshine]

one of the charges is filing false reports

[Ben_Natuf]

then why no criminal charges? I think you meant one of the false charges is filing false reports. This is an AG that promised in her campaign to take down the NRA. It is a political hit job and will fail.

[johnwk2]

@Guilds

@johnwk2

Only human beings can break the law.

Your argument is with the SCOTUS, not me.

I have no argument with you or the SC. I simply stated facts:

The NRA is an inanimate entity… It cannot break the law. Only humans can break the law.

JWK

Joe Biden and the Democrat Party Leadership want elderly American citizens, who paid into Medicare all their lives, to surrender and share their healthcare revenue with millions of illegal entrants who have invaded America’s borders.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Ben_Natuf

The NRA is free to spend its money on whatever it wants. If its all documented and reported, what’s the issue?

The issue is there are laws and rules regulating charitable organizations. And they broke a great many of them. Did you read the filing? It’s all laid out here. Hope this helps with the confusion on what the issue is.

summons_and_complaint_1.pdf

[NebraskaFootball]

And for what it is worth, I do think James should have brought criminal charges against LaPierre. We allow white collar criminals off the hook for their crimes way to easily and often in this country.

[Ben_Natuf]

I know what the issue is. A political hack AG promised in her campaign to take down the NRA. if there were criminal complaints people would be charged with crimes, but no-one is… why is that? The political hack AG has “moved to dissolve the NRA”… will she be dissolving the right to assembly when she does so? If people who worked for the NRA violated the law, charge them.

[NebraskaFootball]

Addressed in the post above this one.

[Ben_Natuf]

@NebraskaFootball

Addressed in the post above this one.

yes, the one where you assume guilt. I don’t recall the legal system working that way.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

Addressed in the post above this one.

yes, the one where you assume guilt. I don’t recall the legal system working that way.

I said charged.

[Munimula1]

Criminal charges may still be brought, from what I hear. Why are posters here sticking up for these crooks?

[NebraskaFootball]

@Munimula1

Criminal charges may still be brought, from what I hear. Why are posters here sticking up for these crooks?

Indeed. This is only the beginning. I have no idea. The NRA leadership has been fleecing its members for years to the tunes of millions and millions of dollars. That used to be considered a bad thing. It’s weird.

[Jezcoe]

@johnwk2

@Jezcoe

@johnwk2

@PizzaReverend

My God. Could the timing of this be any dumber? Trump thanks them for the 10 point boost.

The NRA has had this coming for years, but now is the worst possible time to do this. Couldn’t they have waited 6 months?

Do you think the N.Y. AG may have been paid off to do this? Or, maybe this proves how brain dead Democrat Leaders are.

JWK

The right to keep and bear is specifically intended to maintain an armed citizenry capable to defend itself against a despotic government.

Or maybe… and now hear me out because it is crazy… the NRA broke the law.

The NRA is an inanimate entity… It cannot break the law. Only humans can break the law.

JWK

Well that checkmated me.

[Ben_Natuf]

@NebraskaFootball

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

Addressed in the post above this one.

yes, the one where you assume guilt. I don’t recall the legal system working that way.

I said charged.

you also said criminals. People who are charged are not criminals… yet

[Ben_Natuf]

If there are crooks, charge them, try them, and if they are found guilty, sentence them. The point here is the AG opted instead to file a law suit to “dissolve the NRA”. The NRA is not the issue, the people who may possibly miss used funds are. So why go after the NRA? It’s simple, a political hack law suit.

[NebraskaFootball]

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

Addressed in the post above this one.

yes, the one where you assume guilt. I don’t recall the legal system working that way.

I said charged.

you also said criminals. People who are charged are not criminals… yet

Semantics. Good one!

My opinion is LaPierre is a fraudster who defrauded this organization and its members, along with defrauding the state through false filings. I’m not sure what you would deem the right moniker to assign to someone who has done these things, but criminal seems apropos.

[Ben_Natuf]

@NebraskaFootball

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

@Ben_Natuf

@NebraskaFootball

Addressed in the post above this one.

yes, the one where you assume guilt. I don’t recall the legal system working that way.

I said charged.

you also said criminals. People who are charged are not criminals… yet

Semantics. Good one!

My opinion is LaPierre is a fraudster who defrauded this organization and its members, along with defrauding the state through false filings. I’m not sure what you would deem the right moniker to assign to someone who has done these things, but criminal seems apropos.

so guilty then! we don’t need a trial, or even charges apparently.

[conan]

Yeah right…Some of us already knew about LaPierre lavished lifestyle.

Why now? Once again democrats are using their top law enforcement agencies and government position as a political weapon.

Timing is everything.

[conan]

Need a counter suit that worth billions.

[Munimula1]

I wonder if Oliver North will testify? He probably would love to tell what he knows.

[Guilds]

@conan

Why now? Once again democrats are using their top law enforcement agencies and government position as a political weapon.

How long has this investigation been going on?

Do you have any evidence of your claims?