Nunes aims to put intelligence source at risk

Politics
23

Stop trying to engage me in another topic.

If you want to talk about the OP then do so. If you want to gripe about whether or not the Nunes memo was true then we have nothing left to discuss.

M

24

You’re still trying to play traffic cop. It won’t work. You DON’T want to discuss this because it kills your defense of him. That’s OBVIOUS.

1 Like
25

What is obvious is you need to get off topic.

Won’t work.

Read the OP.

M

26

Nunes has been trying to interfere with the investigation. And the memo was a big part of that.

1 Like
27

Triggered snowflake!

1 Like
30

You can’t be serious.

M

31

The CONTENTS of the memo were already revealed long ago and they DID NOT compromise sources and methods, as the FBI claimed they would. Whether or not you agree with the conclusions of the memo is irrelevant.

Nunes has every right to be skeptical of a claim of compromising methods and sources with this latest information. He ALSO has the fullest security clearance and can see whatever they have. They just don’t want him to see it - like they didn’t want him to see the information that made up much of the Nunes memo.

M

32

Nunes is a cheap rat liar trying to get someone killed to cover his ass. Be careful defending him.

1 Like
33

Why would his ass need covering???

No one has accused him of a crime. They have accused him of partisanship only, but of course he accuses them of the same ting, right back, and with justification.

He’s not trying to get anyone killed. He’s trying to expose the facts of the compromising of the FBI and the DOJ in the last election by partisans and deep staters at the top who decided THEY knew better than Americans who should be president.

What has happened to several agencies is the biggest scandal in our history, as far as the threat to liberty is concerned. The real shame is that the press hates Trump so much they are willing to ignore this as much as they can.

Shows you how much garbage they are today.

M

1 Like
34

It’s butt ugly?

35

Perhaps, but that’s not the context SaysWho was referring to.

M

36

Hate, hate, and still more hate, nothing of substance whatsoever.

It should be obvious to all by now that our institutions of power, particularly the DOJ, FBI, and “Intelligence Community” are far more concerned with covering their own asses and each others on the whole than they are in serving the the nation.

Our “intel community” engages in lying to us with regularity solely for the purpose of covering themselves and tends to be everyone’s favorite scapegoat when things go bad or something they’ve used to send us to war proves not to be true.

Democrats in particular seem to suffer from a sever case of multiple personality syndrome with respect to the intel community.

They were the devil when the WMD’s didn’t play out as warned in Iraq. Now you are a traitor if you question anything coming from them.

Find a truly non partisan judge or special abriter of some sort, let them review the documents for sources and methods exposure, redact only that which is truly necessary for national security and make them public.

37

It should be obvious to all by now that party-first Republicans are far more concerned with covering their party’s ass and keeping their puppet masters in power than they are about the future of the nation.

38

Partisan gibberish.

39

Republicans in particular seem to suffer from a sever case of multiple personality syndrome with respect to the intel community.

You were a traitor if you questioned the credibility of intelligence that led us to Iraq. Now they are the deep state incapable of being trusted when anything negative about Trump comes out

40

Good on you for admitting it:raised_hands:

41

In the interim we had an administration that proved they were interested in politicizing the agencies under its control. We saw first the IRS turned into a political arm of the DNC and a cudgel against any political opposition. That was the first sign.

Since then we have seen evidence that the DOJ and the FBI were also politicized by the Obama administration. You want to pretend we have no reason to alter our perception of the agencies but we have it.

The left, on the other hand, can see the actual misuse of the agencies and they pretend to be blind.

M

1 Like
42

That’s embarrassingly weak even for you.

You made a baseless, ridiculous, factually bereft claim and I called you on it properly.

The FBI has been lying to us for so long about the redactions and reasons for same there is absolutely no reason to believe they’ve suddenly started telling the truth.

Put it before a neutral judge, redact what must be and put the rest out for the public to see.

43

So stop engaging you in the Nunes memo that you brought up because its somehow not related to the topic unless you bring it up…

That’s something

1 Like
44

Could you please cite your sources.