So i guess nothing actually was. Excellent. Onto to the next story posted like this is X without any discussion.
“Look at this interesting thing i found that i am not going to discuss but bring up random nonsense about President Trump’s fraud trial. But i posted because i found it interesting even though i didn’t actually say what was interesting about it”
I just found it interesting that the three examples posted in the story are all major topics for President Trump supporters.
I would have love to have known if that’s the reason the OP thought that the numbers changed
I also found it interesting that anyone actually thought that in the past 20 years conservative were a significant portion of audience of NPR political stories.
NPR is funded with the taxpayers money. What mechanism would it take to close the checkbook?
And BTW the “editor” above divulging all of this partisanship based information still has his job. He’s been lauded as being “brave”? He and his fellow leftist propagandists are laughing their collective arses off at being able to proliferate their agenda with no accountability.
I absolutely do not want news reporting on NPR to be driven by an agenda. The news is the news. Dissapoonting to read this article by a NPR editor but it should not be ignored.
Though NPR does a lot more than just political news and you will get to hear a lot more of what is happening in the wider world than any other cable news channel.
I am not so sure about this. He gave many in the Party what they wanted going back to Bush, but they just held their nose and voted Bush, McCain, Romney because they weren’t Democrats.